One of the difficulties of reading a fan site is that as soon as one of the players (i.e. Kanter or Burkes lately) are not performing folks ask questions like "we should be tradin' him" and while that conclusion might be true there is a lot time and work that needs to be done. Additionally, the thread about the bench situation also, had me pondering that we should discuss the big picture a bit so as to put these “insta changes” into perspective.
So what are the Jazz main objectives this year.
.
1...Win 35 games
.....1a - must be competitive in most (say 35 of 47 losses, to give a mantra of '35 and 35')
2...Develop the system, develop the culture
3...Develop players
.
I picked 35 games as sufficient improvement to enable player/organization/fans satisfaction of 'progress'. Then, when that goal is in progress, it is a wise idea to make coaching decisions that are not 100% toward winning a particular game, but instead made to cement an idea or concept into the team or to give them a chance execute what they SHOULD.
.
This means there will be a lot of play calls, rotations, subbing in the "hot hand" actions that will be experimented with in situations where “just give it to Hayward” would be better AT THAT INSTANT. (the NY Nix have been in the ‘just give it to Carmello’ for the past N years and it is a bad idea in the long run.)
.
So things like examining the bench play call this into question…. Optimize for winning or optimize for the three objectives above? Getting TB3 to reach his potential? How? Or just bench him for sucky shooting in favor of Exum? Or 'plan that player x gets an average of n mins/game in spite of some in-season set backs. etc.
.
I think success should be measured on the three objectives above (almost as equal measures actually) About 3 years from now the weighting will be on winning games. And at that point moving players in and out to fill gaps and who fit the system.
.
What do you think?
So what are the Jazz main objectives this year.
.
1...Win 35 games
.....1a - must be competitive in most (say 35 of 47 losses, to give a mantra of '35 and 35')
2...Develop the system, develop the culture
3...Develop players
.
I picked 35 games as sufficient improvement to enable player/organization/fans satisfaction of 'progress'. Then, when that goal is in progress, it is a wise idea to make coaching decisions that are not 100% toward winning a particular game, but instead made to cement an idea or concept into the team or to give them a chance execute what they SHOULD.
.
This means there will be a lot of play calls, rotations, subbing in the "hot hand" actions that will be experimented with in situations where “just give it to Hayward” would be better AT THAT INSTANT. (the NY Nix have been in the ‘just give it to Carmello’ for the past N years and it is a bad idea in the long run.)
.
So things like examining the bench play call this into question…. Optimize for winning or optimize for the three objectives above? Getting TB3 to reach his potential? How? Or just bench him for sucky shooting in favor of Exum? Or 'plan that player x gets an average of n mins/game in spite of some in-season set backs. etc.
.
I think success should be measured on the three objectives above (almost as equal measures actually) About 3 years from now the weighting will be on winning games. And at that point moving players in and out to fill gaps and who fit the system.
.
What do you think?