I can't answer for him but for me Babbit can't do two things in the NBA- drive to the hoop or play defense. Those are the thing that count in big games. He is a excellent jump shooter.
Additionally I don't think Henry can guard 2's in the NBA. Which means he is a 3. He is still a good player but that knocks a little of his shine off.
I have similar defensive concerns for Hayward. But he strikes me as a player that is likely to continue to improve.
That said I our of those 5 I would probably take Patterson. He is has a post game. He has a jumper. He can finish on the pick and roll. Defensively he is okay and has the tools to get better. He needs to become a better rebounder but if he was perfect he would have gone in the first couple of picks.
you're a total failure. If you can't see what an elite athlete at the wing would do for this team, then I suggest you tune into some games. Plus, it is likely that there will not be a big at #9 who will EVER contend with the current Laker front court.
In short, if we can't nab Monroe or Cousins, I think our smartest move is to take a wing.
Why are you so low on Babbitt?
Patterson seems to be flying under everyone's radar. He could easily end up the Boozer of this year's draft.
History. Name another guy from the past 20 or so years who played at a mid-major and whose team didn't get to the tourney. If he was all that, why did his team suck? The guy was intimidated in Logan, Utah. Wait until he hits the real stage.