What's new

Jazz games less interesting without Kanter ?

What do you think ?


  • Total voters
    36

CAKAR

Well-Known Member
I know that we have got now the opportunity to watch more Favors and AL, but without Kanter there is like missing something. :(

Do you Agree or Disagree ?
 
Not really. I think not having Enes is off-set by seeing more Favors.

Kanter had somewhat peaked in his allotted time slot role too, so nothing we were really seeing was new or exciting. Seeing Favors get extended minutes on the other hand is more exciting too me because it's something new-ish.
 
Not really. I think not having Enes is off-set by seeing more Favors.

Kanter had somewhat peaked in his allotted time slot role too, so nothing we were really seeing was new or exciting. Seeing Favors get extended minutes on the other hand is more exciting too me because it's something new-ish.

Yep. But think about the possibility that it could have been al that was injured. That would have been exciting.

But I do like seeing favors with his terrible offense out there.
 
Not really. I think not having Enes is off-set by seeing more Favors.

Kanter had somewhat peaked in his allotted time slot role too, so nothing we were really seeing was new or exciting. Seeing Favors get extended minutes on the other hand is more exciting too me because it's something new-ish.

face palm
 
No KAnter means the future is less bright as well as the fact of Seeing more Al. Gotta be honest though: Watching Favors on defense last night was freakin awesome!!
 
It's definitely less interesting, but it would be lessened if Ty just played the rest of the youth more instead of the same awful starting lineup he continues to stick with for some unknown reason.
 
Back
Top