What's new

Jazz-Kings Saturday 28th 7:00 MT

Bad game...but a win's a win.
The Jazz had like 15 assists...same as Kings. That's not the Jazz I want to watch.

Milsap and Jefferson are getting too much playing time. Favors and Kanter were doing better on the post than both of Millerson.
 
What pisses me off is that Corbin should have given our young bigs more time tonight (15 mins. each??). Jefferson looked gassed yesterday and today and Millsap was struggling (besides his rebounding). This is when you take advantage of your depth, right? Just like last night, the starting bigs looked way off. On a positive note, Hayward looked tremendous and is such an awesome player when he is aggressive and hitting a shot or two. In addition, Burks can score the ball!
 
Watson with 21 minutes and 0 assists.. that cannot happen.

I know he gets a lot of love around here and he's usually a solid back-up. But Earl Watson has absolutely stunk up the floor the last couple of games - especially on defense. Why they put him on Jimmer at the end of the game is beyond me. You know there is no ****ing way Jimmer is going to put the ball on the floor. So why not put someone with length on him? Hayward? Howard?
 
We got the W despite a weak showing from our front line and that's big news because usually we don't. Big game for Hayward, excited to see if he can build on the momentum.
 
It's probably already been said (haven't read this entire thread) but it's about damn time that Hayward showed some real aggressiveness with his shot. Let's hope that he's out of whatever passive funk he's been in and this is the start of a new trend.

On another topic, is it bad of me to hope that Bell's injured? Not too seriously, but enough to keep him out of games. Less Bell=More Burks, and that's, in my opinion, a good thing.
 
Back
Top