What's new

Jazz looked.....average,defensively and offensively

I got so much **** for saying we should have signed Marco before he signed with the Spurs. I think JFC was 99% against it. (For the historians)

Do you want a cookie bro?

Well, I wanted to trade for Harden. I guess I'm a better imaginary GM than you.
 
Neto (+12) had the highest plus minus! Why, he played zero minutes next to Burke who was -15 in just 16 min. Basically we won that game but **** ourselves hard when Burke was on the court.

Burks was -12 while putting up 18 pts and getting 6 boards. What gives? He played a large portion of his minutes next to Burke. He clearly had a positive +- in the 4th. I bet he was +3 when not playing next to Burke. I bet that's why his +- is 3 points better than TB's.

Addition by subtraction. Get rid of Burke

remember when people were talking about the "Core 4"?

Looks like 2 of those are going to go down as total busts (as far as we're concerned). Not a good average.
 
remember when people were talking about the "Core 4"?

Looks like 2 of those are going to go down as total busts (as far as we're concerned). Not a good average.

You mean Gobert, Favors, Hayward and Burks/Hood? ;)
 
no bro. "Core 4" was originally coined for Hayward, Favors, Kanter, and Burke. c'mon.

Wrong.

"Core 4" was Hayward, Favors, Burks, Kanter.

Those 4 were from consecutive drafts. Burke was never part of that term.
 
^that's right. My bad.

But Burke was enthusiastically regarded as a core piece right from the start. There were even people saying that "we finally have our alpha".
 
Back
Top