but george hill is good enough to net you the first pick outside the lottery? explain that logic to me.
Serious?
1) George Hill is (and was) a better player
2) George Hill is a significantly younger/more inexperienced player
3) Last year was much more of a buyer's market than this year
4) There wasn't a stink on Hill that the Spurs had been shopping him for the better part of his tenure
5) George Hill is (and was) a better player