NAOS
Well-Known Member
This is way too generous of an assessment. Blind squirrels find nuts, but we shouldn't pat them on their backs for their savvy vision. Your **** was awful in this thread.
JAZZ must not WASTE this year.
- Thread starter Et tu Brute
- Start date
Et tu Brute
Well-Known Member
I agree my notion of the 'wasted year' was trashy...
But I'm basically happy they chose Exum over Hood. Now it's time for him to repay them.... (I know this isn't what happened - basically DM eliminated Hood - but trusting in X as a complimentary piece moving forward is great)
Also, I am the biggest Rubio doubter in the world (it was tough being a disbeliever for much of last year)
Ingles was great.
DM was unbelieveable.
Gobert's injury kept them from winning 50+
And Favors earned that big one year guarantee.
Great great year....
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
In lots of ways Exum is our eX (see what I did there 
) factor. If he stays basically the same it is just kind of ok. If he regresses it would hurt us quite a bit. But if he breaks out then, wow, watch out. An Exum that can hit 3's at a reasonable rate, continues the defensive development we have already seen, and is more comfortable running the offense on the floor, now that is a dangerous addition to the bench and pushes us up another notch.
) factor. If he stays basically the same it is just kind of ok. If he regresses it would hurt us quite a bit. But if he breaks out then, wow, watch out. An Exum that can hit 3's at a reasonable rate, continues the defensive development we have already seen, and is more comfortable running the offense on the floor, now that is a dangerous addition to the bench and pushes us up another notch.