Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
On the flip side, what’s DM winning without Gobert.we will win enough games to make it to the playoffs every year with Gobert. But to ultimately win a champ we'll need Mitchell.
On the flip side, what’s DM winning without Gobert.we will win enough games to make it to the playoffs every year with Gobert. But to ultimately win a champ we'll need Mitchell.
Depends on what team he's on. Like funneling everything to Gobert isn't the only winning strategy in basketball. Many options out there.On the flip side, what’s DM winning without Gobert.
Do any of those other options include a defensive upgrade for every player, if not the jazz would have to average 130pts at the very least, and the jazz are better offensively with Gobert on the floor, so can we include an offensive upgrade for everyone?Depends on what team he's on. Like funneling everything to Gobert isn't the only winning strategy in basketball. Many options out there.
Only one that’s viable, since no one can keep their man in front of them.Depends on what team he's on. Like funneling everything to Gobert isn't the only winning strategy in basketball. Many options out there.
Just shut the hell up already, you sound like a ****ing idiot!!Depends on what team he's on. Like funneling everything to Gobert isn't the only winning strategy in basketball. Many options out there.
Ya and well, if mitchell balls out and we win a championship then he will be the MVP of the team. This poll however isn't about hypotheticals or what the future holds. Rather, it is asking who is the current Jazz MVP. And the answer to that question is obviously Gobert.we will win enough games to make it to the playoffs every year with Gobert. But to ultimately win a champ we'll need Mitchell.
That's FO's problem. They made a conscious decision of not pursuing any perimeter defender. It's the only thing viable for the Jazz because they chose to put themselves in this situation. There are ways to play defense and win ball games without funneling everything to your big man. All I'm saying is that the possibility does exist. So you acting like Donovan cannot win anything had him played without Rudy isn't exactly warranted.Only one that’s viable, since no one can keep their man in front of them.
So apparently winning ball games in ways other than the drop big strategy is a complete new concept. My bad.Just shut the hell up already, you sound like a ****ing idiot!!
Holy **** this exact thing happened tonight. lolWe lose Mitchell for 3 games, we win. We lose Conley for what, 8 games? We win 7 of them. We sit Gobert for 3 minutes in the third quarter and our 18 point lead nearly immediately evaporates. It's Gobert and it's not close at all.
I ain't talking **** on Conley who is night-and-day better, but his +/- is a little sus since he plays almost all of his minutes with Rudy.We lose Mitchell for 3 games, we win. We lose Conley for what, 8 games? We win 7 of them. We sit Gobert for 3 minutes in the third quarter and our 18 point lead nearly immediately evaporates. It's Gobert and it's not close at all.