I will be blunt: signing Svi and Eubanks while at the same time letting Dunn and Fontecchio go has zero sense if the Jazz are going to execute any reasonable long-term strategy.
If the Jazz are going to tank and give young players heavy minutes then Svi and Eubanks are simply blocking them and getting a meaningless win or two. If the Jazz is about accumulating assets then they could have used the cap space they wasted on Svi and Eubanks to take a bad player in exchange for a pick. Or simply to sign a risky player who has a good chance to become better and outperform his contract (Svi and Eubanks are exactly what they are and will not suddenly flourish). If the Jazz are going to compete then it makes no sense to bring Svi and Eubanks while letting Dunn go at the same time. Or trading Fontecchio .
The latest moves by the Jazz make sense only if their strategy is to continue doing exactly what they have been doing in the past two years: be mildly competitive and, thus, put butts in the seats and finish just outside the play-in. While hoping at the same time that someone drafted in the late lottery/late first round turns out to be a star and patiently waiting for a hoped-for collapse of the Wolves or Cavs. This is the worst imaginable strategy basketball-wise but, likely, the safest and most profitable for the team owner.