NAOS
Well-Known Member
The mistakes in downtown SLC happened way before City Creek. Was the church responsible for some of them? Yes, but there wasn't much they could do about that in 2010 other than try again. Yeah they provided some views for their temple so ****in what. They also put a 385' condo tower across the street from the temple, another 220' residential building fronting Regent street, and have plans for a third on 100 south. They reduced the number of retail stores within the malls and opened them up to property to the south that they don't own. It has spurred development in a downtown that was on life support before they started. It's been nice to finally have a downtown that isn't completely dominated by for lease signs. I was super skeptical when they announced plans to redevelop and I'm not an LDS fanboy by any stretch but I'll give them their due when they earn it. In this instance they have earned it.
I'd argue that they (and by this I mean something like 'a coterie of LDS developers as well as church officials', working in some kind of cahoots) were a primary force in pushing downtown SLC onto life support in the first place (but not before taxpayers paid for trax thru main street, of course). Better to depress prices and hope before you pay for your own (undemocratic) vision (cf. the earlier Main Street heist).
I'm most familiar with the changes from the late 90s through mid-00s (while I lived in DT SLC); and based on what I saw and heard, I'm refusing to give the church and the associated business interests any claps. And I think City Creek is tacky in multiple ways.