Jazzfanz ALL-TIME Fantasy Draft

[Siro]

I vote against this. I already know what happens if you do it that way. My team is gone.

I would like to see how my team does. Is there not a way to set up a bracket where everyone plays? It's kind of B.S. to sit through all this and get cut from the get go.

Why not vote who gets the bye. And give everyone a chance?

Regardless of how it's done, some teams will be weeded out. I really don't like the idea of letting everyone vote on the top 8. It makes the other rounds irrelevant.

 

[spycam1]

I'll be out till like 7 or 8 MST. Hopefully the draft is done by then. I think everyone seems okay with picking a top 8 and going from there, so plan on that.

 

[spycam1]

Regardless of how it's done, some teams will be weeded out. I really don't like the idea of letting everyone vote on the top 8. It makes the other rounds irrelevant.

I'll be out, but you can continue this discussion with everyone, if you'd like. I still like the idea.

 

[Siro]

I'll be out, but you can continue this discussion with everyone, if you'd like. I still like the idea.

But I haven't heard a response to my objection! If we're doing it that way, what would be the point of a tournament?

 

[Former Member]

With my final pick, I draft "Thunder" Dan Majerle!

Very few basketball players could spread the floor like Thunder Dan!

Very few basketball players had a candy bar like Thunder Dan!

And Very few basketball players had a Celine Dion music video like Thunder Dan!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSbR9W4wlTQ

 

[NUMBERICA]

Regardless of how it's done, some teams will be weeded out. I really don't like the idea of letting everyone vote on the top 8. It makes the other rounds irrelevant.

Voting on byes does the same thing. We have 4 teams too few or 4 teams too many. There is no perfect solution. Tossing the bottom four and doing head-to-heads seems to make the most sense.

So maybe what we should do is vote out the bottom-4 instead of vote in the top-8.

 

[Siro]

Voting on byes does the same thing. We have 4 teams too few or 4 teams too many. There is no perfect solution. Tossing the bottom four and doing head-to-heads seems to make the most sense.

So maybe what we should do is vote out the bottom-4 instead of vote in the top-8.

That sounds more reasonable. Knowing everyone's top choices would take away from the head-to-head suspense.

 

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

Alright, I'll call Anthony Daivs a PF, but he's still guarding your SF in some cases.

 

[NUMBERICA]

Damn. Nice pick on Majerle.

 

[spycam1]

Voting on byes does the same thing. We have 4 teams too few or 4 teams too many. There is no perfect solution. Tossing the bottom four and doing head-to-heads seems to make the most sense.

So maybe what we should do is vote out the bottom-4 instead of vote in the top-8.

Great idea.

 

[NAOS]

I think the only way to beat NUMBERICA's team of badmother****ers is to play Rocky to his Apollo Creed. You may win, but only because you stand up at the 9-count. Oh, and you'll also end up retarded.

 

[Gyp Rosetti]

Voting on byes does the same thing. We have 4 teams too few or 4 teams too many. There is no perfect solution. Tossing the bottom four and doing head-to-heads seems to make the most sense.

So maybe what we should do is vote out the bottom-4 instead of vote in the top-8.

We already have Catchall and Hack in that group.