What's new
By:

Jazzfanz Mock Draft 1.0

suns select Jalen Smith.



Suns get defense outside shooting. With this big man. He needs to become a better post player as he’s a bit robotic
 
For me pairing him with Ayton is to good to pass up. He can play off of Ayton quite nicely and provide more rebounding and shot blocking
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
suns select Jalen Smith.



Suns get defense outside shooting. With this big man. He needs to become a better post player as he’s a bit robotic
Click to expand...

Bit of a reach but I think this is how the real draft will go... some surprising picks and teams going for guys they like or fit.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Bit of a reach but I think this is how the real draft will go... some surprising picks and teams going for guys they like or fit.
Click to expand...
This pick is a bit of a gamble. He’s not a great athlete and moves a bit weird, but he’s a long 6-10 with potential for being a good rebounder and shot blocker and has a nice jump shot from three. If those things translate to the nba he’s worth the 10th pick, and the suns need his defense.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
This pick is a bit of a gamble. He’s not a great athlete and moves a bit weird, but he’s a long 6-10 with potential for being a good rebounder and shot blocker and has a nice jump shot from three. If those things translate to the nba he’s worth the 10th pick, and the suns need his defense.
Click to expand...
I think he will be a rotation player... think he will be like Kelly Olynyk maybe more length/defense but less passing.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
Idiot!!! @Wes Mantooth we aren’t on your side, only idiot Hume
Click to expand...

I must consider with fortitude a robust response, an empiricist response, one that relies on observations and precludes hypothetical theoretical entities. Wes’ mindset is empirically unobservable. Hence, we cannot pronounce judgment other than “empirical adequacy”, or “”agnosticism” or “empirical inadequacy”. I trust that my good colleagues shall reflect on this matter.
 
fishonjazz said:
I must consider with fortitude a robust response, an empiricist response, one that relies on observations and precludes hypothetical theoretical entities. Wes’ mindset is empirically unobservable. Hence, we cannot pronounce judgment other than “empirical adequacy”, or “”agnosticism” or “empirical inadequacy”. I trust that my good colleagues shall reflect on this matter.
Click to expand...
Come again?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top