What's new

Kamala Harris for Pres

My question was about who pushed Kamala not the importance of money to the campaign. Someone mentioned that campaign funds was merely an excuse and not the reason they chose Kamala.
I thought your question was about why Kamala was chosen rather than who.

The who is easy. Delegates chose her.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Didn’t the senate acquit him of the first impeachment?
Senate acquitted him of both. Welcome to the world or partisan politics.

Apparently they didn't think its a big deal for the Capitol to be attacked and people die just because trump said the election was stolen from him.

They also thought it was fine for the president to blackmail a foreign leader into investigating trumps political opponent.

Partisan politics.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Zero racism is pushed but yes there is anti-male in women’s sports pushed and gender affirming care for minors pushed.
You just ****ing said the reason you didn't support democrats is because they support minorities that you don't care about and then the fiction that is all things related to transgender people.
 
You just ****ing said the reason you didn't support democrats is because they support minorities that you don't care about and then the fiction that is all things related to transgender people.
In the example I gave it was specifically for gender affirming care for minors and transgender-males in female sports. That is it. Anything else is projection.
 
In the example I gave it was specifically for gender affirming care for minors and transgender-males in female sports. That is it. Anything else is projection.
Yeah. Utah passed a ban on transgender people playing in sports. It stopped 3 kids in middle school from participating in sports. This is what you're worried about?

Idiot status confirmed.

You probably think teachers are initiating the gender affirming care and the school nurse is administering the medication all without the child's or the parent's consent.

And just in case you are extra clueless, there have been 3 surgeries on people under 18 in the entire U.S. over the last 10 years that could be considered gender affirming surgery. We don't have the details, but it is safe to assume these were kids with both sets of genitalia that had one set removed. So under 18 transgender surgeries are essentially unheard of and NO ONE is advocating to change that.
 
Yeah. Utah passed a ban on transgender people playing in sports. It stopped 3 kids in middle school from participating in sports. This is what you're worried about?

Idiot status confirmed.

You probably think teachers are initiating the gender affirming care and the school nurse is administering the medication all without the child's or the parent's consent.

And just in case you are extra clueless, there have been 3 surgeries on people under 18 in the entire U.S. over the last 10 years that could be considered gender affirming surgery. We don't have the details, but it is safe to assume these were kids with both sets of genitalia that had one set removed. So under 18 transgender surgeries are essentially unheard of and NO ONE is advocating to change that.
All you guys ever do is name call. Showing your real true colors.

I also didn’t say gender affirming surgery, I said care. That number skyrockets among children 17 and under.

In 2021, 5,063 children were on puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones, more than double the number in 2017.

18,700 transgender youth are impacted by bans in Georgia, Iowa, Mississippi, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Utah.

In 2019, the rate of gender-affirming surgeries for minors aged 15 to 17 was 2.1 per 100,000.

I could be wrong but 2.1 per 100,000 is a lot more than 3 total over 10 years.
 
Yeah. Utah passed a ban on transgender people playing in sports. It stopped 3 kids in middle school from participating in sports.
No it didn't. It stopped 3 boys from competing in girls divisions. They were not stopped from participating in sports. As was recently said to me, you shouldn't have to lie to prove your point.
 
Aren’t a lot of the billionaires on the left ?
Money simply feeds politics. We are very nearly a corporatocracy with as much influence as business has in politics. Thanks to unfettered lobbying providing an avenue for quasi-legal bribes, business has an undeniable and overwhelming influence on our politics. Just look at the last 2+ decades of ignoring antitrust laws in favor of allowing business to do whatever they want and the oligopolies that have arisen as a result and are now price gouging everyone because there are no market forces to keep prices low. Not to mention continually lowering taxes on businesses and instead raising the real tax rate of the middle class who carries the burden of funding government. Our political and economic system might be permanently broken since there is no incentive for politicians to do anything about it since big business is lining their pockets.
 
LOL. Do you really think Joe Biden is going to do that kind of political favor for the person who forced him off the ticket and refused to even let him stand on the same stage with her? There are a number of people who think Joe's comment about Trump supporters being garbage was done deliberately to sink her.

The title of First Woman President should go to someone worthy of it, someone who wins it. It shouldn't go to someone who couldn't win in the primaries, accomplished nothing, and led to her party losing the House, Senate, and Presidency.
 
LOL. Do you really think Joe Biden is going to do that kind of political favor for the person who forced him off the ticket and refused to even let him stand on the same stage with her? There are a number of people who think Joe's comment about Trump supporters being garbage was done deliberately to sink her.

The title of First Woman President should go to someone worthy of it, someone who wins it. It shouldn't go to someone who couldn't win in the primaries, accomplished nothing, and led to her party losing the House, Senate, and Presidency.
Not only is it really stupid, and hopefully unlikely, I think its dangerous. Do we really want to set a precedent where the unelected bureaucrat oligarchs can show they can install anyone they choose to the highest elected office for any stupid reason they want. Do they just want to show that they can put someone in the Whitehouse based only on skin color and gender? What other reason is there? Nobody likes her and nobody voted for her!

These are the reasons the vast majority voted for major government reform!!! It's a joke.
 

Biden should resign and Kamala should use emergency powers to declare The Rapist a threat to democracy and a traitor, which he has already proven himself to be. Arrest him and test the Supreme Court decision that a President is immune to prosecution for Presidential acts.
 
Biden should resign and Kamala should use emergency powers to declare The Rapist a threat to democracy and a traitor, which he has already proven himself to be. Arrest him and test the Supreme Court decision that a President is immune to prosecution for Presidential acts.
...and you see that ending well for your side, do ya?
 
Back
Top