What's new

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
In America? Why? Seems like weak leadership to me. Standing with an ally in Europe is good, yet standing with your ally in the Middle East is bad?
Or just on the Democratic side? I can’t imagine the Republicans would sit this one out.

She's not going to win over any staunch zionists. But being tough on Netanyahu is a prerequisite for a big progressive turnout. A lot of people are sick of the ongoing genocide in Gaza and we need to push back.

I don't want to litigate the conflict here, I'm just expressing that I think its a good and necessary move in the right direction.
 
In America? Why? Seems like weak leadership to me. Standing with an ally in Europe is good, yet standing with your ally in the Middle East is bad?
Or just on the Democratic side? I can’t imagine the Republicans would sit this one out.
Because people don't like funding a genocide
 
She's not going to win over any zionists. But being tough on Netanyahu is a prerequisite for a big progressive turnout. A lot of people are sick of the ongoing genocide in Gaza and we need to push back.

I don't want to litigate the conflict here, I'm just expressing that I think its a good and necessary move in the right direction.
It's probably just performative and nothing will change about the USA/Israel partnership if she assumes leadership, but at least it something I guess.
 
LOL.. if she’s the candidate, Trump’s gonna win in a landslide.

Time for Michelle Obama to step up to the plate.
Nobody ever wins in a landslide in the 2 party system. There will always be 10's of millions of votes for each candidate

It could be Jeffrey Dahmer vs Jesus himself and Dahmer would still get 10's of millions of votes because people vote based on color (red or blue) more than anything else.

I always see posts on Facebook saying "vote blue!" or "vote red!"

We should stop voting for ****ing colors. But alas, we do.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top