What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Biden was too old.

Now Harris is just tooooooo darn DEI (black and unqualified, just like CRT, Woke, and DEI means). Unlike the superior race candidate, who is totally qualified. He’s a true patriot who god protects. He is always the victim. But also a conqueror. MAGA!

Why don’t our non-partisan neutral posters who like totally aren’t In the bag for Trump ever focus on Trump’s flaws? What has he done to earn his position in life? What about his age? What about his character flaws? What about his crimes?

Isn’t it funny how some folks always find faults with the Democrats while somehow turning a blind eye to the most flawed candidate in the history of American politics?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
TheStormofWar said:
DEI... Dude, she was the ****ing VP. She beats Trump in more than a few polls and Biden doesn't step aside unless the numbers supported it. Nearly all of the party, the donors, and leadership has rallied around and endorsed her. Find some new talking points.
Click to expand...
She also hasn’t attempted a coup, hasn’t raped anyone, and isn’t trying to be a dictator.
“bUt HeR fLaWs.”
 
Democrats have a handful of really good politicians who are so much more articulate and not compromised who would be a much better choice than Harris. Same as the Republicans who also had many far better choices that the narcissist who now has a God complex if he didn't already have one. Shame. Pete B would've been an excellent choice that really could've swung things.

and sorry anyone who denies Harris was 100 % DEI and not merit is nothing more than a blinkered fool Enjoy the coming all round ********
 
Douchebag K said:
Democrats have a handful of really good politicians who are so much more articulate and not compromised who would be a much better choice than Harris. Same as the Republicans who also had many far better choices that the narcissist who now has a God complex if he didn't already have one. Shame. Pete B would've been an excellent choice that really could've swung things.

and sorry anyone who denies Harris was 100 % DEI and not merit is nothing more than a blinkered fool Enjoy the coming all round ********
Click to expand...

View: https://x.com/glnoronha/status/1815125151547003000?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


Sounds like middle schoolers talking about the Ukraine war.

Or…

View: https://youtu.be/iP-e5qR4vDU?si=LY2gA20jHwDrbMLy


Yeah, maybe she isn’t the best candidate.

But the Democrat Overlords told us Kamala is the nominee so we must accept and obey. We are not allowed to speak ill of her now. Praise Kamala!
 
Is anyone going to talk about the original DEI, Trump? What has he done to accomplish anything? He inherited a bunch of money from his dad, bankrupted a bunch of businesses, and raped women. He even admitted that because he was a rich old white guy that he could grab women’s private parts and get away with it. He’s an unbelievably flawed candidate. Why don’t we ever focus on him?

Why are Democrats always the ones falling short?
 
TheStormofWar said:
My favorite part was when you DEI=DIE folks tried lump an Oxford post-grad dude as a DEI hire.

Whether you like it or not, she was the Veep, so you're little narrative don't hold. Cry harder.
Click to expand...
Folks bashing Harris for being a DEI while supporting Trump’s pick of Mike Pence… lol. What was pence to Trump? The token white Christian who could soften Trump’s edges and win over evangelicals. What were his qualifications again? A failed governor who was going to lose his election in Indiana?

Our totally neutral posters are going out of their way to bash Harris and Democrats while ignoring Trump and all of his many flaws. So predictable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TheStormofWar said:
My favorite part was when you DEI=DIE folks tried lump an Oxford post-grad dude as a DEI hire.

Whether you like it or not, she was the Veep, so you're little narrative don't hold. Cry harder.
Click to expand...

good grief you're stupid. Joe Biden specifically said he was going to choose a black woman. Harris was a spectacular failure in her run for President. You still think he chose her on merit ?? Utter clown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Bucknutz said:
Don’t know much about RFK do you? He is not on the Democrat ticket is he?

What are the other options the democrats can roll out?

Shapiro
Pete
Beshear

My top 3, 2 moderates and one that would bring excitement and intellect. 2 younger Governors with Pete being a future President as VP (needs more governing experience).

Can win the swing states.
Click to expand...
It sounds like you have no clue who RFK is, mate.

Dude is more in-line with Trump's base than a the usual Dems as his ******** peddling is something they eat right up. An antivaxxer is a non-starter for almost every traditional Dem voter out there. If you can't wrap your head around that, well, that's on you.
 
Douchebag K said:
good grief you're stupid. Joe Biden specifically said he was going to choose a black woman. Harris was a spectacular failure in her run for President. You still think he chose her on merit ?? Utter clown.
Click to expand...
Oh please. Trump choose Pence because he shored up his Evangelical creds, which he was sorely lacking at the time. DEI selection by your logic. Clinton chose Gore as his running mate as Gore shored up something Clinton was lacking at the time: family value appeal. Hell, Ross Perot back in the mid 90s chose retired Adm. Stockdale because it gave him some "military cred". Reagan chose Bush Sr. because he had deep government experience, which Reagan lacked at the time. Every Veep is initially selected during the first term for some reason or another. It does not change the fact they were the ****ing Vice President (except for Stockdale, he just reiterates the point).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top