What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Elizah Huge said:
Vocal Trump supporters have increasingly become unbearable. Like they’re going after Caitlin Clark for liking Taylor Swift’s Kamala endorsement post? Stop being weirdos, Democrats don’t do this. People can have differing views than you. It’s having the opposite effect on someone like me who is a little more right leaning but his supporters are making me re-think because of how they act.
Click to expand...

Democrats don’t do this? This just happened 2 weeks ago…
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5294.jpeg
    IMG_5294.jpeg
    93.5 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_5293.jpeg
    IMG_5293.jpeg
    278.8 KB · Views: 6
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Bucknutz said:
Democrats don’t do this? This just happened 2 weeks ago…
Click to expand...
I have no idea what this is referring to or what point is attempting to be made.
I see someone named Brittanylynne liked a post about trumps agenda and then brittneylynne talked about haters.

Did you forget to post the part where someone hated on Brittneylynne for liking the post?

I have no idea who brittneylynne is but I would definitely be critical of her for supporting the must corrupt, scandalous, dishonest, and immoral candidate in history.

I would criticize Taylor Swift as well if she supported a person as horrible as trump is.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
I have no idea what this is referring to or what point is attempting to be made.
I see someone named Brittanylynne liked a post about trumps agenda and then brittneylynne talked about haters.

Did you forget to post the part where someone hated on Brittneylynne for liking the post?

I have no idea who brittneylynne is but I would definitely be critical of her for supporting the must corrupt, scandalous, dishonest, and immoral candidate in history.

I would criticize Taylor Swift as well if she supported a person as horrible as trump is.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It’s Patrick Mahomes wife, Taylor Swifts ex bff.

I couldn’t care less about peoples political leanings, especially famous people. I don’t understand why anyone would reach out and harass people about their views. There is a difference between having a discussion where you are knowingly opening yourself up. But liking a post = getting harassed is garbage behavior.
 
Bucknutz said:
It’s Patrick Mahomes wife, Taylor Swifts ex bff.

I couldn’t care less about peoples political leanings, especially famous people. I don’t understand why anyone would reach out and harass people about their views. There is a difference between having a discussion where you are knowingly opening yourself up. But liking a post = getting harassed is garbage behavior.
Click to expand...
I did forget about that. Getting harassed for who you vote for is trash in general.
 
Bucknutz said:
It’s Patrick Mahomes wife, Taylor Swifts ex bff.

I couldn’t care less about peoples political leanings, especially famous people. I don’t understand why anyone would reach out and harass people about their views. There is a difference between having a discussion where you are knowingly opening yourself up. But liking a post = getting harassed is garbage behavior.
Click to expand...
So did she get harassed? So far all I have seen is a picture you provided of her talking about haters.

I do find it funny that she posted "to be a hater as an adult you have to have some deep rooted issues you refuse to heal from childhood. There's no reason you brain is fully developed and you hate to see others doing well"
Which accurately describes trump. whom she apparently is a fan of. Ironic.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
So did she get harassed? So far all I have seen is a picture you provided of her talking about haters.

I do find it funny that she posted "to be a hater as an adult you have to have some deep rooted issues you refuse to heal from childhood. There's no reason you brain is fully developed and you hate to see others doing well"
Which accurately describes trump. whom she apparently is a fan of. Ironic.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It also accurately describes folks that spend a decade circle jerking each other over Trump hatred on a sports message board. Maybe that is one thing you secretly hate about yourself is that you are a hypocrite?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Al-O-Meter said:
You mean someone online said "nuh uh"? How do you prove a negative?
Click to expand...
This is why the person making the positive claim has the burden of proof. If that burden is not met then the claim is not substantiated and can be safely dismissed.

Otherwise we'd be plagued by fools proposing a vast array of conspiracy theories and basing their entire outlook on their own custom selected list of said conspiracy theories...

Oh.
 
Sardines said:
This is why the person making the positive claim has the burden of proof. If that burden is not met then the claim is not substantiated and can be safely dismissed.

Otherwise we'd be plagued by fools proposing a vast array of conspiracy theories and basing their entire outlook on their own custom selected list of said conspiracy theories...

Oh.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree with anything you said. I also don't think Kamala was wearing radio earrings, and certainly don't think radio earrings are to blame for Trump's horrible debate performance. My original comment was very specifically about Kamala liking the look of them as that is exactly what her ear attire looked like.

Completely separate from Kamala's radio earrings, I find claims of things being debunked or proven wrong when they have not, and sometimes cannot, be proven wrong to be tiresome. No one has proven that Kamala wasn't wearing receiver earrings. That doesn't mean I think she was, but it does cause me to make a judgement of the person making the claim of proof.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
I don't disagree with anything you said. I also don't think Kamala was wearing radio earrings, and certainly don't think radio earrings are to blame for Trump's horrible debate performance. My original comment was very specifically about Kamala liking the look of them as that is exactly what her ear attire looked like.

Completely separate from Kamala's radio earrings, I find claims of things being debunked or proven wrong when they have not, and sometimes cannot, be proven wrong to be tiresome. No one has proven that Kamala wasn't wearing receiver earrings. That doesn't mean I think she was, but it does cause me to make a judgement of the person making the claim of proof.
Click to expand...
Fair enough
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top