What's new

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date

Democrats Have A Lengthy History Of Casting Doubt On Election Results


FOR DECADES, DEMOCRATS HAVE REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF ELECTIONS THEY LOST

DEMOCRATS CALLED THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION “STOLEN,” “FRAUDULENT,” AND A “COUP D’ETAT”

 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
DEMOCRATS REPEATEDLY CAST DOUBT ON THE LEGITIMACY OF THE 2004 ELECTION
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
DEMOCRATS REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF THE 2016 ELECTION
DEMOCRATS HAVE CONTINUED TO CAST DOUBT ON OTHER ELECTIONS SINCE 2016
BIDEN AND HIS OFFICIALS HAVE PUSHED STOLEN ELECTION CLAIMS
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
I disagree. Hillary is saying the election was illegitimate. It is a verbal attack on the system.

I appreciate you admitting that it wasn't an attempt to overturn an election.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
For the simpletons: cast doubt is huge goalpost move from attempting to overturn an election.

Cast doubt is way different than calling a state official and telling them to find non existent votes.

Cast doubt is way different than sending fake electors.

Cast doubt is way different than sending a mob to the capital to overrun it and try to stop the certification.

Cast doubt is way different than telling the VP not to certify the election.

Cast doubt is way different than creating a stop the steal fund.

Cast doubt is way different than saying the election was stolen for 5 years everywhere you go and every time you speak.

Cast doubt is way different than filing over 60 court cases with no evidence knowing you have no evidence and you are just wasting everyone's time.

Stupid trolls got me again.

Bye

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
For the simpletons: cast doubt is huge goalpost move from attempting to overturn an election.

Cast doubt is way different than calling a state official and telling them to find non existent votes.

Cast doubt is way different than sending fake electors.

Cast doubt is way different than sending a mob to the capital to overrun it and try to stop the certification.

Cast doubt is way different than telling the VP not to certify the election.

Cast doubt is way different than creating a stop the steal fund.

Cast doubt is way different than saying the election was stolen for 5 years everywhere you go and every time you speak.

Cast doubt is way different than filing over 60 court cases with no evidence knowing you have no evidence and you are just wasting everyone's time.

Stupid trolls got me again.

Bye

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
The only point to claiming democrats engaged in election denial is to justify Trump's actions. Think about that. That means that they KNOW what Trump did and why it was wrong. Because if Democrats did a wrong thing, and Trump did at least as much as what the Democrats did then that means Trump also did a wrong thing.

Since Hillary, Obama, Biden, etc., are not running for President then I don't have to worry about what "the Democrats" did because "the Democrats" is not a candidate for President. Trump is and Kamala is. I'll be voting for the one who wasn't involved in election denialism. Which is a relief because I'll also be voting for the one who isn't a convicted felon, isn't a sexual assaulter, isn't a blowhard jackass and an all around ****** person.
 
The only point to claiming democrats engaged in election denial is to justify Trump's actions. Think about that. That means that they KNOW what Trump did and why it was wrong. Because if Democrats did a wrong thing, and Trump did at least as much as what the Democrats did then that means Trump also did a wrong thing.

Since Hillary, Obama, Biden, etc., are not running for President then I don't have to worry about what "the Democrats" did because "the Democrats" is not a candidate for President. Trump is and Kamala is. I'll be voting for the one who wasn't involved in election denialism. Which is a relief because I'll also be voting for the one who isn't a convicted felon, isn't a sexual assaulter, isn't a blowhard jackass and an all around ****** person.
I’d normally agree with you but…

What about tax cuts and conservative judges? And doesn’t it feel like eggs are way more expensive? And aren’t Haitians eating pets and raping all of the white womens?
 
Biden and Harris suck so bad.

View attachment 17303
You continue to prove how much of a falsely informed rube you are.

There has been no withholding of funds to victims of hurricane Helene. None. Didn't happen.

If you think there was withholding of funding you should ask where you got that information, then immediately classify that source as unreliable, then ask yourself why they lied to you in the first place.
 
Both of these guys have gone out of their way to agree with each other before providing the contrasting point.
 
Back
Top