Sexual Favors Well-Known Member May 21, 2014 #25 I wouldn't do it. I doubt SAC would as well. Kanter and cousins in the front court? They need some D!
I wouldn't do it. I doubt SAC would as well. Kanter and cousins in the front court? They need some D!
Avery Well-Known Member May 21, 2014 #27 Still don't get why everyone is so gung-ho about replacing Kanter with someone who probably isn't his equal. Addition through subtraction?
Still don't get why everyone is so gung-ho about replacing Kanter with someone who probably isn't his equal. Addition through subtraction?
orangello Well-Known Member May 21, 2014 #28 Avery said: Still don't get why everyone is so gung-ho about replacing Kanter with someone who probably isn't his equal. Addition through subtraction? Click to expand... I agree. If Kanter gets you into the top 4 then do it otherwise don't. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
Avery said: Still don't get why everyone is so gung-ho about replacing Kanter with someone who probably isn't his equal. Addition through subtraction? Click to expand... I agree. If Kanter gets you into the top 4 then do it otherwise don't. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
Ferguson_Mellochill Well-Known Member 2019 Prediction Contest Winner May 21, 2014 #29 If the Jazz believe in Randle or Vonleh, I could see them considering trading Kanter. Otherwise, I don't think the Jazz would do Kanter + 23 for 8.
If the Jazz believe in Randle or Vonleh, I could see them considering trading Kanter. Otherwise, I don't think the Jazz would do Kanter + 23 for 8.