I'm glad I'm the only Jay-V supporter. I will rub it in all your faces in 5 years when he is the better player.
Hey, I have him behind Kanter but he's still probably top 3 or 4 on my draft board.
I'm glad I'm the only Jay-V supporter. I will rub it in all your faces in 5 years when he is the better player.
Valanciunas does not have a post move to speak of, and I rare saw him taking any outside shot
I won't claim to know Kanter's ceiling, but at least we know he already has the ability to do a little bit of everthing. Utah won't be in a position to draft Kanter and "hope" that the missing pieces to his game eventually devlope. The exact opposite is true with JV.
While I don't disagree with your assement that Kanter is a more finished product today, it ignores one of KOC's fundamental axioms--That when assesing young talent, you can't compare where they are at today, but try to project where they will be at in 2 to 3 years.
Further, despite how many times the Jazz repeat "BEST PLAYER AVAILABEL" they have a demonstrated history of locking in on a postional need. (Kanter is a pf, Jonas is a C)
It wouldn't suprise me at all if the Jazz draft Kanter but he won't keep that Jazz hat long. It also wouldn't suprise me if Jonas V. ends up wearing that Jazz hat by the end of the draft night.
Picking at 3 in this draft kind of defeats BPA. Who's to really say Kanter is better than Knight, or vice versa and so on. If two players are close in talent/ability then you pick the one that fits your team/need.
KOC's strategy that he has stated many times
1. BPA
2. If two players are really close, then go for size
3. Last thing to be considered is fitting a team need
Do I believe that he always adheres to this? Not really, but he has stated that this is how he goes about his biz.