I think creating and scoring from scratch is a worthy required attribute to be considered a legit #1 option on a contender and I don't think Lauri is there. But it's not like he's a lightyear off and you could do worse with your #2 option than an athletic 7 footer that leads the league in thrunks by a healthy margin (my term for threes or dunks) and scores >25 ppg on >.65 TS% (a VERY small group of players have EVER done this). Most players have comps of some variety and after this season I do not know who Lauri's is.I was just listening to Tim MacMahon and Spence Checketts discuss whether or not he's a number 2 option on championship team, they didn't even discuss the possibility that he could develop into a number 1 on a championship team and didn't even seem totally convinced that he's a number 2. I also see fans on twitter frequently discussing whether he's a 2nd or 3rd option on a contending team.
I guess I'm missing something. To me he's a surefire 2nd option on a championship level team, and I'm still not completely convinced that he can't be a number 1 if he continues to develop and the Jazz put the right pieces around him.
I don't think coming out of this season with an ELITE secondary option was on anyone's bingo card so that's great. Maybe he can develop more on-ball in the next couple of seasons.