What's new

LDS Church fined for contributions to Prop 8!! HA!

I support gay marriage with absolute conviction. But I also find it somewhat disheartening the way the LDS church is painted as the enemy in discussions such as these. The LDS church was not the only church or organization to oppose proposition 8. Every indication is that they did so in a manner consistent with California law. It's not that the other opposition groups get a pass -- it's that they aren't even mentioned that bothers me; I'd be fine with this if I actually thought the LDS church was the primary driving force behind the passing of Prop 8. I am unconvinced of this. I am more convinced that they are the most convenient target of our wrath.
There's no doubt that the LDS Church gets dragged through the mud WAY more than anybody else about this whole thing. The Church contributed $190,000 out of $40 million, and they were the whole reason it passed? Get a freaking clue.
I'm not saying the Church's position is right or wrong on the issue. I actually feel that homosexuals get the raw end of the deal for the most part and should be allowed the same rights and privileges that I am. But blaming the Church for Prop 8 passing and being happy that they were fined for a clerical issue is ludicrous. The way Katie is going off about this, it is VERY obvious she has a bone to pick and is looking for reasons to be pissed off at the Church and happy when anything negative comes out about it.
 
This isn't an equal rights issue. It's a marriage issue. If gays are allowed to marry, what's to keep anyone from marrying their brother, sister,

Laws against incest.


Cousins get married in many parts of the world.

12 year old lover,

Marriage is a contract between people old enough to form consent.

pet, tv, or football?

Unable to form consent.

Do homosexuals really need to have a piece of paper signed by the state to love one another? How superficial of them.

Because it's not about next-of-kin rights, hospital visitation rights, inheritance laws, tax laws, etc. It's about the piece of paper.

While all those evil religious people are the materialistic, superficial, close minded people....

I'm sure some of the evil religious people are not superficial. Of course, there are also the good religious people, but they are mostly arguing against you.
 
One of my friends wrote this. What sayest ye?

Many homosexual couple adopt and raise children that have no other home. If your friend really thinks marriage is for providing a stabvle home for children, they should support homosexual marriage for the sake of all those children that, at the moment, are forced to live with two single people.
 
Um, hell no...Good job church and in the end, they got their way. Fine? meh..the fact they are right doesnt hurt my opinion either. :D
 
I love how people are making fun of me without me even posting anything in this thread. I think it's really odd you think of me that much and it shows how idiotic you all are. So all of you that mentioned my name please enlighten me on my stance of homosexuality and marriage. I believe this would be honz, pennypacker, and Jesus. Let's see you back your trash talk since you know me so well.

Wow, both honz, penny, and Jesus didnt respond.....I wonder why......;)
 
Wow, both honz, penny, and Jesus didnt respond.....I wonder why......;)

Because we all know your stance on homosexuality and gay marriage. We've all been through the same argument with you dozens of times on the old board and you are too retarded to have a discussion with.
 
Wow, both honz, penny, and Jesus didnt respond.....I wonder why......;)

Jesus is probably busy tending to his flack - but I don't know what's up with Honz or Penny.



I will go out on a limb, however, and say that most folks don't try to make fun of any other poster just for the sake of making fun of the poster but rather to make fun of a specific comment or post of theirs. As Darkwing noted, Beantown, many of your statements that seemed ludicrous to others were lost in the crash. Therefore, you have a tabula rasa, so to speak.
 
Last edited:
Secondly, this whole thing really isn't about marriage. It never was. Because you're right to say that having a piece of paper signed by the state doesn't really mean all that much just for itself. What this is really about is the *acknowledgment* of the union by society at large. That's really the purpose behind marriage. It's an announcement to society that two people are devoted to each other and plan to make their lives together. That's why they're such big family affairs, and why weddings have so many guests... it's the public blessing that people support the couple's new life together. A marriage certificate only means something if the people in your community recognize it as legitimate... but if instead they always turn away and tell you you're going to hell, then it's just words on paper with no meaning at all. It's about - to use Farley's phrase - "psychic security and basic well-being." Would you enjoy everyone telling you you're evil and a bad person because you loved someone sexually? That's a day-in, day-out battle on your peace of mind, just trying to live your life.

That's why I think that the argument on both sides has been fundamentally misdirected. Homosexuals often frame the argument say "it's none of your business who I want to marry, your opinion shouldn't matter because it's my individual right to get married." Well, actually, in a macroscopic sense the opinions of others *do* matter, because marriage fundamentally *is* the blessing of the union by the community... otherwise people wouldn't bother to get married, they'd just decide to be together and not bother to tell anybody. But the societal acknowledgement and blessing *is* the marriage. So at the bottom of it, gays aren't asking to be married as such, just to have the piece of paper, they're fundamentally asking to be accepted. Because the fact is that they're going to be together no matter what anyone else says... but they may be scorned and spurned from society for doing so.

In any case, I watched the trailer for the movie mentioned in the thread title about Prop 8. Honestly, it looks pretty terrible. It's basically a Michael Moore flick. I may agree with a lot of it, but what good will it actually do? It's so polemical that you'll just be preaching to the choir. People on the other side aren't going to be able to stand sitting through it, and I hardly blame them.

But the fundamental point against the anti-gay marriage folks here (or even simply anti-gay folks in general), for which I've never heard a satisfactory response, is exactly who is hurt by gays getting married, or just being together. I just don't get it. We constantly hear these sound bites about how gays are a "threat to America" or a "threat to our way of life." What exactly does that mean? What threat? Gays are no more sexually perverted or more likely to be sexual predators than straight people. They're not evil. They don't "convert" people. So what exactly is this "threat"?

Can anyone tell me? I don't have the first clue.

First of all I have to say this was a very written and thought out post.

I completely agree with your equating marriage as social acceptance.

I guess in the end my opposition to accepting gay marriage comes to the fact that I see all homosexual activity as morally wrong. Much like I see all sex outside of a traditional marriage as wrong. I can be tolerant of homosexual couples-but I doubt I can ever accept that kind of relationship. It is simply wrong. I see accepting gay marriage as damage to the morality of our society.

There is also the concern about where curtailing Freedom of Religion meets with all of this.

The final thing I have to say about the anger over the involvement of LDS church in the Proposition 8 campaign- they were one of many churches involved. Where is the anger and backlash towards Baptists? Catholics? etc?
 
Because we all know your stance on homosexuality and gay marriage. We've all been through the same argument with you dozens of times on the old board and you are too retarded to have a discussion with.


So you make fun of me because of my stance on homosexuals, and seen my stance dozens of times, it sounds like you're an expert on my views. So please enlighten me and the rest of Jazzfanz on what my views are.......unless you're too much of a pansy....
 
Back
Top