What's new

Long past time for a good philosophical thread, doncha think?

k imagine that instead of making 20 of those posts over a two month or so period, i made 20 of them a day, for years, through today, the present, in an effort to subvert the 60 or so active members of a utah jazz internet forum

also imagine that i say "internet lol" before snorting and stomping and linking to post histories and posting dictionary entries when someone pulls and snaps back the mask of my desperate virtual defense mechanism

i do believe you when you say you wanted a discussion about something here, but it's not about the idea stirner was trying to communicate. i'd suggest not posting authoritatively about things you know nothing about, or at the very least, owning your own interpretation before posting a thread like this, lest you attract those pesky sticklers for reason, clarity, and correctness again

funk boogie spin the wheel!
 
Atheists against christians, christians against atheists. Heh, ole Max wouldn't know why they tryin to fight they own damn selfs, eh?

"As with the Classical Skeptics, Stirner's method of self-liberation is opposed to faith or belief; he believed that life is free from "dogmatic presuppositions" [7] or any "fixed standpoint".[8] It is not merely Christian dogma but also a variety of European atheist ideologies that he condemned as crypto-Christian for putting ideas in an equivalent role."
 
"Stirner insists that Feuerbach's rejection of God as a transcendental subject leaves the divinity of the Christian predicates untouched. In short, rather than describing human nature as it is, Feuerbach is said to have deified a prescriptive account of what being human involves. As a result, the real kernel of religion, the positing of an ‘essence over me’ (46), had been left intact. Indeed, Stirner suggests that Feuerbach's achievement was to have effected a ‘change of masters’...all the left-Hegelians are said to have reproduced the basic Feuerbachian error: separating the individual from his human essence, and setting that essence above the individual as something to be striven for. In contrast, Stirner maintains that because it has no universal or prescriptive content, human nature cannot ground any claim about how we ought to live."

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/

Shades of Freddy Nietzsche there, eh? Max, he busts them all. Left-wingers, commies, right-wingers, anarchists, atheists, religious devotees, you name it.
 
Well done, Slopper, well done. Currently I cant give you any reputation, but just know, some positive rep is coming your way once I can. Again, bravo!!!
 
Heh, that's hilarious. Buncha weak-*** bitches fightin for "rep points" and hatin on anybuddy that don't hate. Aint they got no kinda self-respect at all? Apparently not. I pity da fooz.
 
**** yeah, 50% of the posts in this thread are Hopper being an egotist. WEIRD! Never saw that coming!
 
Buncha damn philistines round this here joint, I tellya! Aint nobuddy got nuthin to say bout Max Headroom, one of the greatest thinkers of all time--right up there with John Lee Hooker.
 
Thread: Long past time for a...
Just like I promised. Bravo! -VINYLONE

Heh, Vinny, I thot ya wuz just funnin, eh?

Now I kinda curious...Whatcha like bout this here thread, anywaze? Ya didn't make no comment in it, er nuthin.
 
Still waiting for a good philosophical thread...
 
Back
Top