What's new
By:

Manson Getting Married

QuinSnydersHair said:
the sense of realism was too much.
Click to expand...

What does this even mean? Was it a documentary?

DutchJazzer said:
LOL!! wus.
your mind/emotions already would support a ****oris
Click to expand...

Wow. That's going to leave a mark.

QuinSnydersHair said:
Haha. Seriously take a watch. I love all genres of film. I can stomach virtually anything. I just, I don't know, didn't want to stomach it any longer. Maybe it was my mood that day, I'm not sure.
Click to expand...

On a non-**** talking note, did you see this movie after the birth of your first born? Or maybe during the pregnancy? Sometimes people's sensitivity to this kind of stuff changes after they've brought a life into the world.
 
VINYLONE said:
What does this even mean? Was it a documentary?



Wow. That's going to leave a mark.



On a non-**** talking note, did you see this movie after the birth of your first born? Or maybe during the pregnancy? Sometimes people's sensitivity to this kind of stuff changes after they've brought a life into the world.
Click to expand...

Yes and I wondered the same thing tbh.
 
VINYLONE said:
Hey Eric! Hope all is well. Could you not One Brow this thread, please? Thanks.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the kind thought.

It's nice you're so concerned abut the all-important topic of Manson's marriage, to the point that 8 or so posts on Dahmer is not a problem, but my one sentence is a problem. However, assuming that no one tries to defend how using lady parts to insult a man is in no way disrespectful of women (which seems so obviously wrong to me), I don't think any derailing will happen.

Unless you want to argue about whether I intend to derail this thread, of course.
 
One Brow said:
I don't think any derailing will happen.
Click to expand...

zMNcGOG.jpg
 
One Brow said:
Thank you for the kind thought.

It's nice you're so concerned abut the all-important topic of Manson's marriage, to the point that 8 or so posts on Dahmer is not a problem, but my one sentence is a problem. However, assuming that no one tries to defend how using lady parts to insult a man is in no way disrespectful of women (which seems so obviously wrong to me), I don't think any derailing will happen.

Unless you want to argue about whether I intend to derail this thread, of course.
Click to expand...

As a man I don't want to have any lady parts and I don't want my female partner to have any male parts. I like my women to be feminine and I imagine my woman likes me to be masculine. Nothing wrong with that.
 
One Brow said:
Thank you for the kind thought.

It's nice you're so concerned abut the all-important topic of Manson's marriage, to the point that 8 or so posts on Dahmer is not a problem, but my one sentence is a problem. However, assuming that no one tries to defend how using lady parts to insult a man is in no way disrespectful of women (which seems so obviously wrong to me), I don't think any derailing will happen.

Unless you want to argue about whether I intend to derail this thread, of course.
Click to expand...

Dahmer is interesting. Oversensitivity is boring.
 
I think being imprisoned might be helpful in maintaining a healthy marriage.

Also, he'd better get a prenup before this broad claims half his victims.
 
It's okay QSH, I don't think I'd be able to get through that Dahmer flick either, and I pull in more ***** and have a larger **** than anyone on this site.
 
One Brow said:
However, assuming that no one tries to defend how using lady parts to insult a man is in no way disrespectful of women (which seems so obviously wrong to me), I don't think any derailing will happen.
Click to expand...

I've noticed you never seem offended when I use male parts to insult someone. TBPFHWY, you come off as sexist.
-
train-derailment.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top