Mark Cuban's afraid of the witchhunt. he might think he is next target of the witchunt

[PearlWatson]

The fact of the matter is that gay "marriage" does not affect you personally in any way.

9/11 didn't effect me personally but I'm still against Muslims flying planes into buildings.

Now before you get all obtuse and think I'm making a direct comparison I will state the point straight out.

You can legitimately be against actions because of the way they effect other individuals, communities, and society overall when they will never effect you personally.

 

[Deleted member 848]

You can legitimately be against actions because of the way they effect other individuals, communities, and society overall when they will never effect you personally.

terrorists hijacking planes has zero chance of affecting you personally? Lol. Obtuse, narrow-minded, and dim-witted all in one.

 

[DutchJazzer]

9/11 didn't effect me personally but I'm still against Muslims flying planes into buildings.

Now before you get all obtuse and think I'm making a direct comparison I will state the point straight out.

You can legitimately be against actions because of the way they effect other individuals, communities, and society overall when they will never effect you personally.

omg thats perfectly said.

because i think it effects communities and society negativly(again think, got no prove just a theory)

 

[One Brow]

Americans

Name one American forced into a gay marriage, please.

 

[One Brow]

You can legitimately be against actions because of the way they effect other individuals, communities, and society overall when they will never effect you personally.

So, you can name people who are not in a gay marriage, and who are affected by gay marriage in some way?

 

[DutchJazzer]

So, you can name people who are not in a gay marriage, and who are affected by gay marriage in some way?

John Q. Public

 

[DutchJazzer]

So, you can name people who are not fat, and who are affected by fat people in some way?

the whole ****ing society is affected by those morbidly obese people(at least healthcare wise), they make healthcare expensive.

sometimes things indivudials or groups of people do affects everybody in some way.

 

[PearlWatson]

you're avoiding the question, which is cute. I'm sure my inquiries elucidated how leaky, and preposterous your position is on this issue. Which I'll gladly take.

It's a beautiful question, really. Answer yes, and you're advocating Eugenics. Answer no, and all the sudden your argument for homosexual union falls apart. If the government has "no business in things" like you say, then it should in no way prohibit homosexuals from marrying.


Your perspective is convoluted, poorly thought out, and contradictory. Good day.

If by "beautiful question" you mean libtarded question.

You have zero understanding of Darwin inspired eugenics. It was about preventing the "wrong" people from contributing to the gene pool. Infertile couples are the LAST people Darwinists would be concerned about.

Either your liberal infested Canukian education system is crap or you have the comprehension skills of your ape-like ancestor. Probably both.

 

[PearlWatson]

terrorists hijacking planes has zero chance of affecting you personally? Lol. Obtuse, narrow-minded, and dim-witted all in one.

Yup, you got your ape-like ancestors comprehension skills.

 

[♪alt13]

the whole ****ing society is affected by those morbidly obese people(at least healthcare wise), they make healthcare expensive.

sometimes things indivudials or groups of people do affects everybody in some way.

Actually as I pointed out with smokers fat people, due to their propensity for dieing early, are actually less costly for the government and the healthcare system. It is the health nuts that live to age 90 breaking hips and managing Alzheimers that are so damn expensive.

 

[DutchJazzer]

If by "beautiful question" you mean libtarded question.

You have zero understanding of Darwin inspired eugenics. It was about preventing the "wrong" people from contributing to the gene pool. Infertile couples are the LAST people Darwinists would be concerned about.

Either your liberal infested Canukian education system is crap or you have the comprehension skills of your ape-like ancestor. Probably both.

btw in nature some species of animals prefer to mate with partners with disabilities.

because of their disabiltie meaning they are better survivors

 

[DutchJazzer]

Actually as I pointed out with smokers fat people, due to their propensity for dieing early, are actually less costly for the government and the healthcare system. It is the health nuts that live to age 90 breaking hips and managing Alzheimers that are so damn expensive.

actually their was like a dutch research. that pointed out smokers and fatties are the biggest drain on healthcare.
so now if you wanna stop smoking or start losing weight, it is covered by health insurrance.
coaching coach, dieting coach. all other kinda things that help you stop smoking(nicotine patches etc) are now covered by HI.

meanwhile, they removed stuff like birth control and std test(unless you have like symptoms) from things that are covered.


but on the other hand we dont really have lots of the