marvin on the trade block .

[Chad Feldheimer]

I'd pass. There will be a bunch of guys this year after the dust settles who could be had on the very cheap.

 

[mellow]

A tweener who is too small for pf and too slow for sf? Inconsistant 3p% and low rebounding. 4 years 30 million.

Make it happen KOC.

 

[vslice02]

I read that post by Locke last night and really all I took away from it was: The Hawks are looking to trade Marvin Williams and he'd be a nice addition to the Jazz but they can't afford it so it probably won't happen. Solid stuff.

 

[Gyp Rosetti]

KK, Look at it from all the angles. For the 5th option on that Hawks team that is pretty good. You can't expect everyone to put up 22 10 man. He was playing SF and 5 rebounds isn't bad for 30 minutes when they also had Smith, Horford and Johnson who all rebounded well. If your expecting eye popping #'s you need to be looking at the superstars, but wait, they ARE NOT COMING HERE!

He would bring athleticism, versatility and defense- A guy that maybe could guard a Kobe, LeBron,Durant better than any of our current players right now. He also is still fairly young too.

I would take a chance on him for sure but would the ATL do it?

Thank you for making my point for me. He's the fifth option for a reason. He's not that freakin' good. And I don't want to be bogged down with 3-4 years (I forget which) at about 7.5M per for a tweener who' be exposed in any major game and who'd be a good 5th option at best. Our current 5th option, Matthews, will most likely get a couple M less per year, isn't a tweener, busts his butt and brings legit skills to the court. Not just athleticism with 30% from three as a small forward which would make AK look like Steve Kerr.

 

[dwill#1]

So I'm guessing you hate Gordon Hayward and his 29% 3 point percentage too?

 

[Gyp Rosetti]

So I'm guessing you hate Gordon Hayward and his 29% 3 point percentage too?

He shot 44% as a frosh.

Yet 30% is Williams high.

Basic Math.

 

[green]

Thank you for making my point for me. He's the fifth option for a reason. He's not that freakin' good. And I don't want to be bogged down with 3-4 years (I forget which) at about 7.5M per for a tweener who' be exposed in any major game and who'd be a good 5th option at best. Our current 5th option, Matthews, will most likely get a couple M less per year, isn't a tweener, busts his butt and brings legit skills to the court. Not just athleticism with 30% from three as a small forward which would make AK look like Steve Kerr.

This is kind of off topic, but I don't think Matthews will be back. After seeing what Darko, Gooden, etc have gotten, some fool will miss out on big free agents and I bet Matthews gets pretty close to, if not the full mid-level exception. Utah would then let him go, because he is a nice player, but he is very replaceable.