NAOS
Well-Known Member
I guess my real issue concerning the Bogut talk is this: if it is true that both MIL and UTAH are in rebuilding modes, then we both want high picks and cash... so, how can we help each other out if we need the same things? They're not going to be interested in a trade which features Bogut for AJ as the main moving pieces because it doesn't accomplish anything. Now, they may be interested in Millsap for money savings, but we'd probably have to give them a high pick and take on a bad contract (Salmons? Gooden? Maggette?). Would MIL be interested in:
Utah trades: Millsap + GS pick next year + Okur (salary/expiring) + filler
Mil trades: Bogut + bad contract
?
I don't think so.
Utah trades: Millsap + GS pick next year + Okur (salary/expiring) + filler
Mil trades: Bogut + bad contract
?
I don't think so.