What's new

NAOS prediction: by end of 2017-18, Hood will be finalist for MIP

The best case scenario is definitely a breakout season and then figure it out from there.

That is a good scenario. My best case scenario is trading him for a better player, an equal player on a good contract or a player with more potential.
 
just no. You're having a bad day.

I am having a great day, this day has been fantastic for me as usual. Glad you're back on Jazz fans. I missed your angry responses and feeling like your right on everything, its that awesome early 20s mentality we all miss. It makes the board slightly more entertaining.

Any other arguments you want to make up for me that are easy to knock down?

How about Hayward? You think he stays? Arent you one of the people who thought we should not have maxed him last time? Are you hoping he leaves or stays?
 
I am having a great day, this day has been fantastic for me as usual. Glad you're back on Jazz fans. I missed your angry responses and feeling like your right on everything, its that awesome early 20s mentality we all miss. It makes the board slightly more entertaining.

Any other arguments you want to make up for me that are easy to knock down?

How about Hayward? You think he stays? Arent you one of the people who thought we should not have maxed him last time? Are you hoping he leaves or stays?

I think we should go back to your rock-solid argument about how Exum outplayed Mack all year + how the stats show it. I really liked the part how you then reversed course on both points and pretended that you'd landed exactly where you wanted to. Wild ride.

Or we could go back to your not-defining-yet-defining circular mess about Rodney Hood, and how I've somehow constructed a strawman argument within your maelstrom. You pick.

Also, incredible disses in the quoted post here.

Also, don't worry, I'll disappear again as soon as Hayseed's future is known.
 
I think we should go back to your rock-solid argument about how Exum outplayed Mack all year + how the stats show it. I really liked the part how you then reversed course on both points. Wild ride.

Or we could go back to your not-defining-yet-defining circular mess about Rodney Hood, and how I've somehow constructed a strawman argument within your maelstrom. You pick.

Also, incredible disses in the quoted post here.

Also, don't worry, I'll disappear again as soon as Hayseed's future is known.

I have not reversed course. I think Exum outplayed Mack across the season. You are the one claiming i have switched.

Sorry you don't see how making up an argument for me and then trying to shoot down that pretend argument is poor logic. Not much I can do for you.

It's not helping your case to keep claiming I am saying things I'm not. Maybe take a minute smoke another bowl and relax?

Also I hope you don't disappear, you are entertaining. We need you and Hack back, you two are good reading.
 
If Hayward leaves, then I say start Exum and hood, and lets see if they can take the next step. They will either prove that they can, and we re-sign them, or they will prove that they can't, and we get a high draft pick next year.
 
If Hayward leaves, then I say start Exum and hood, and lets see if they can take the next step. They will either prove that they can, and we re-sign them, or they will prove that they can't, and we get a high draft pick next year.
That's reasonable, although with the other talent Utah has, we probably won't get a high draft pick. Also, remember Utah MIGHT be in this situation because Lindsey rebuilt (vs. retooled) up until this season. Hayward toiled away on losing teams. Would Gobert be willing to do the same? If Utah misses the playoffs for the next few years, does he leave as a FA?

I still see Lindsey bringing in a veteran PG to split minutes with Exum. Without Gordon, they'd need offense: Teo?

With Gordon, Hill would be the 1st choice if Utah can afford him (or if Gordon has given that ultimatum as a condition of him signing). Otherwise, if Hill still wants too much, Lindsey could go 3&D with a trade for Beverley. Or even Rubio.
 
If Hayward leaves, then I say start Exum and hood, and lets see if they can take the next step. They will either prove that they can, and we re-sign them, or they will prove that they can't, and we get a high draft pick next year.

Hood would be the featured scorer if Hayward leaves. Consistency, and durability are the two biggest fears here. We know that Hood can light it up, and has potential to be a big time scorer if healthy.

Exum needs a chance to play, ie be in the rotation. I don't even care if he starts, but he cannot have a string of DNPs in 2018.

Also, Burks may get a chance to be featured a lot more if Hayward leaves. Favors as well.

Hood, Burks, Favors = a lot of talent, but so much health risk/scare.
 
Back
Top