Nate Robinson

[carolinajazz]

He'll always carry the stigma of being too short.

...possibly why it took him 15 tries before he got one to go to win the slam dunk contest? Oh, wait! Spud Webb, who was smaller won the thing without missing a single dunk!!!

 

[carolinajazz]

seriously it wont matter.
nate is put in a good/perfect system.
jazz have no system.
so i think first we need to start with a system and pilosophy.
then get the players.

in a jazz uni this season nate robinson would have sucked major ***

...true dat!

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

seriously it wont matter.
nate is put in a good/perfect system.
jazz have no system.
so i think first we need to start with a system and pilosophy.
then get the players.

in a jazz uni this season nate robinson would have sucked major ***

The Bulls system is far from perfect, offensively speaking. Defensively, yes it is.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Nate is playing great right now because he is the only player on the team that can create offense. He had a good game 1, I will be surprised if he can keep it up for the entire series.

 

[default]

I suspect the Jazz could get him for 2 years at 2.5 mil/yr.

 

[Hotdog]

Nate is playing great right now because he is the only player on the team that can create offense. He had a good game 1, I will be surprised if he can keep it up for the entire series.

He has been doing it all year long.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

He has been doing it all year long.

Not really.

https://espn.go.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/2782/nate-robinson

Look at FG% for the months of December, February, and April. This guy is hot/cold.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I suspect the Jazz could get him for 2 years at 2.5 mil/yr.

I think after this Nate will probably be in the 4-5 million range.

I support getting him as a backup.

 

[carolinajazz]

Not really.

https://espn.go.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/2782/nate-robinson

Look at FG% for the months of December, February, and April. This guy is hot/cold.

...bottom line is when Nate plays under control and shoots well the Bull's can win. When he's out of control and fires up shot after shot, they get beat.

 

[Hotdog]

Not really.

https://espn.go.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/2782/nate-robinson

Look at FG% for the months of December, February, and April. This guy is hot/cold.

Ok. Now please show me somebody's fg% that doesn't vary month to month. Its not like its huge swings either. Plus he has gotten inconsistent minutes all year because of Heinrich being in and out.

 

[Hotdog]

Lets sign Nate. Chicago only offering the minimum. We could swoop in and get him for a couple mil a year. Thats a hell of a steal. The guy is good regardless of his size.

Having a little guy on your team can be a weapon too.

 

[D Will Texas]

Lets sign Nate. Chicago only offering the minimum. We could swoop in and get him for a couple mil a year. Thats a hell of a steal. The guy is good regardless of his size.

Having a little guy on your team can be a weapon too.

AGREED! Sign Nasty Nate up , ASAP!!!!

 

[Harcher]

Lets sign Nate. Chicago only offering the minimum. We could swoop in and get him for a couple mil a year. Thats a hell of a steal. The guy is good regardless of his size.

Having a little guy on your team can be a weapon too.

Only offering the min? Wow. Does he have attitude issues that makes him less desirable? My only recollection of the playoffs in the eastern conf was him performing like hero bring wins to the bulls.

 

[Biggs]

Yes please. Nate, and Tinsley and call it an off-season

 

[Hotdog]

Why? He'll always carry the stigma of being too short. I don't think he would cost more than 4 a year, but could probably get him for a little less.

He is gonna get way over paid. Like 8-10 million per type overpaid.

lol no he won't. He's been playing for 2-3 mil for the last couple of years. 5 mil max, and that's still a stretch imo

4 yrs/25 mil confirmed.

plausible.

I suspect the Jazz could get him for 2 years at 2.5 mil/yr.

Default was the closest.

Nate got 2 years/4mil with Denver

 

[Hotdog]

Crazy that he still goes for so cheap. He may be short but he is good.

Deserves better

 

[gregbroncs]

Ehh never been a fan of Nate. He definitely can change a game. Unfortunately as often as not that change is not good for his team.