What's new

New joker

mX4UIFr.jpg


yeah right.

joker having the time to sit still to get tattooed.

dc cinematic universe sucks.


big fan of dc. but giving the joker ink is against his character. so yeah will be skipping these lame *** dc movies
he looks like a joker fanboy instead of the actual joker

this coming from a guy who liked his ladies inked ala burningangel.
 
also joker would never put damaged tat on his forehead. he does not consider himself damaged. he is a nihilist. how and why would he consider himself damaged.

sigh they know nothing about joker and his psychology.

this is a harmless hispter joker fanboy.


sigh hipsters taking over batman :S
 
What is a superhero? What is a villain? I hope they come out with more movies like this so I can eventually grasp the concept.
 
In the comics several Joker renderings have several tattoos. I like some of the tattoos, paleness and glove. He is to clean for me though.

But it might come off very differently on screen.
 
Idk it will be tough to follow Heath Ledger. He played it about as perfectly as anyone could. I know this is a different version, but the vast majority of the unwashed masses won't see it that way. They just know they saw Ledger absolutely knock it out of the park, and now here is a dude with a very different take. It will be interesting to see.

FWIW I agree with Dutch about the "damaged" label. In almost every iteration the Joker has never really seen himself that way. I admittedly don't know much about the SS version, so maybe he does here. Usually he is a nihilistic sociopathic genius, which really makes him the most dangerous non-supernatural bad guy out there.
 
Idk it will be tough to follow Heath Ledger. He played it about as perfectly as anyone could. I know this is a different version, but the vast majority of the unwashed masses won't see it that way. They just know they saw Ledger absolutely knock it out of the park, and now here is a dude with a very different take. It will be interesting to see.

FWIW I agree with Dutch about the "damaged" label. In almost every iteration the Joker has never really seen himself that way. I admittedly don't know much about the SS version, so maybe he does here. Usually he is a nihilistic sociopathic genius, which really makes him the most dangerous non-supernatural bad guy out there.

well i read most of the comics. and it is unjoker like. if he ever got a tatoo it woul be a homemade one with a knife jsut a quick knife to the skin.why would he have his own joker tattoo. he inst a narcissist, but maybe re-imagine the joker since we seem to live in a narcissistic isociety these days.

narcissist only care about them self, and their preservation of their own live, which is so unjoker like.

aah too bad.
 
Don't care about comic book movies, but this Joker looks like ****.

Looks like an 80s punk rocker who's desperately trying to convince you he's edgy.
 
Not really digging it. I don't feel like there are great minds behind this movie or the Superman vs Batman movie.

Having the Joker in a Suicide Squad movie is unnecessary in the first place. Like, if you're going to make a movie about the suicide squad, then focus on those characters. You shouldn't need to use the Joker as a crutch.
 
This might be a dumb question, but didn't the joker die or is this some new franchise? Is it possible this character is a copycat joker?
 
Seems dumb to go back to the Joker already. I know he is one of the more popular villians for Batman, but you are only setting yourself up for failure by trying to follow Ledger and Nolan.
 
Seems dumb to go back to the Joker already. I know he is one of the more popular villians for Batman, but you are only setting yourself up for failure by trying to follow Ledger and Nolan.

also a reason why nolan skipped joker in batman begins.
joker is to iconic and also everyone knows him. he is popular.

his thinking was i wanted to make a batman (origin) movie. not a joker movie.
so this might be a mistake
 
Back
Top