Well-- when the game is determining who is crowned world champs, one team clearly can step up to the plate and seize the opportunity.
I agree. Seattle played a hell of a game and Denver didn't. Good for Seattle. they are the champs as they should be after that game. Normally UGLI has good points and argues them in a dumb/funny way which is part of his charm. This time he simply has a stupid point. Seattle is not 43-8 better than Denver. They simply are not. It was one game. Using that as diffinative proof is stupid. Like pointing to one game between San Antonio and Miami and saying whoever won that one game is clearly better. For that one game sure. But in general? It simply is not that cut and dry. If he wants to call that homerism then thats fine. Homerism it is.