What's new
By:

Nick Rockefeller knew about the plans for a 9/11 "event".

Collapses into it's own footprint, all on it's own apparently.

wtc-7-collapse-o.gif
 
Nick Rockefeller told me the 100,000+ people required to pull this off will all spill the beans pretty soon. I think he said it's going down December 21st.
 
franklin said:
Nick Rockefeller told me the 100,000+ people required to pull this off will all spill the beans pretty soon. I think he said it's going down December 21st.
Click to expand...

So that is what the Mayans were counting towards! The truth to 9/11!
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
Straight up.

What's there not believe when you look at the evidence?

Oh wait..... it was dudes in caves, and Americans stood down to terrorists holding box cutters.
Click to expand...

When people are in groups they are less likely to act on their own. Just human nature. Add that to the highly stressful situation and agressive armed men yelling at you when you have limited ability to move. I can understand why people froze.

Put this same scenario and have some terrorists armed with box cutters in a central park somewhere and I think the response will be dramatically different.
 
Stoked said:
When people are in groups they are less likely to act on their own. Just human nature. Add that to the highly stressful situation and agressive armed men yelling at you when you have limited ability to move. I can understand why people froze.

Put this same scenario and have some terrorists armed with box cutters in a central park somewhere and I think the response will be dramatically different.
Click to expand...

Interesting analysis on the first two planes, and I'll go ahead and just humor the case.
These people knew they were going to die after the first plane hit, and they still all just froze?
Many passengers of who worked for the federal government.

So..... how would you explain the lack of wreckage at both the Shanksville site, and of course the Pentagon?
Not to mention the wing marks existing in 1994, without a bomb hole.

shanksville1994flight93wu1.jpg


No wing marks or engine puncture holes in the Pentagon?

010914-F-8006R-003-600.JPG
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
Interesting analysis on the first two planes, and I'll go ahead and just humor the case.
These people knew they were going to die after the first plane hit, and they still all just froze?
Many passengers of who worked for the federal government.

So..... how would you explain the lack of wreckage at both the Shanksville site, and of course the Pentagon?
Not to mention the wing marks existing in 1994, without a bomb hole.

shanksville1994flight93wu1.jpg


No wing marks or engine puncture holes in the Pentagon?

010914-F-8006R-003-600.JPG
Click to expand...

I have no interest in truly debating your 9/11 Truther stuff. I just don't.

I was simply commenting on the psyhcological responses of people under a highly stressful situation. I can see why they didn't attack in that situation. You can see it in a lot of hostages in various crimes. They often fail to act even when presented with a clear oportunity. So I can see why they didn't.
 
Stoked said:
I have no interest in truly debating your 9/11 Truther stuff. I just don't.

I was simply commenting on the psyhcological responses of people under a highly stressful situation. I can see why they didn't attack in that situation. You can see it in a lot of hostages in various crimes. They often fail to act even when presented with a clear oportunity. So I can see why they didn't.
Click to expand...

Hmm..... alrighty then.
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
Hmm..... alrighty then.
Click to expand...

No harm no foul. I just find why people react the way they do understress to be interesting. YOu never truly know how you respond till you are in that situation.

I have since learned how I respond.
 
I'd love to be a part of a genuine conversation about this issue.

Does anybody actually think this tragedy was adequately investigated?
 
NAOS said:
I'd love to be a part of a genuine conversation about this issue.

Does anybody actually think this tragedy was adequately investigated?
Click to expand...

For me that would be a hard question to answer. So much of it is covered up and classified that I can understand why people have their conspiracy theories. I am for a smalelr more transparent government in most areas so I would say that I would default to "no" but that does not equate me thinking it was perpetrated by the US government.
 
Before I take this at all seriously...

What of the "terrorists" that got on the commercial planes? Were they working for the CIA? Did the CIA convince them to kill themselves?

What of the passengers on those planes? Were the same commercial airliners used or were military jets flown into the buildings?

What hit the pentagon?

Why does it matter if the building fell on it's own footprint?

Who did this? Why?

There are so many problems with any notion that this was not carried out by the people we currently believe carried it out. The burden of proof is large and squarely on the shoulders of anyone proposing a conspiracy.
 
NAOS said:
I'd love to be a part of a genuine conversation about this issue.

Does anybody actually think this tragedy was adequately investigated?
Click to expand...

The investigation was rushed through, and covered up very quickly.

It's beyond belief how classified any topic of 9/11 is to this day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top