What's new
By:

Obama: ISIS Will “Not Be Defeated with Guns” But By “Better Ideas"

DutchJazzer said:
the only non American?
talk to you Israeli friends, brother. ooh wait you don't have any. your an anti-Semite!
Click to expand...

OMG! YOU FOUND THE WHITE WHALE! You found that one guy that spends his food stamps on sushi and lobster!

Proud of yourself?
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];1083000 said:
Lol this is kind of Germany propaganda that starts WWII. Lol war crimes on Bush. You libs want Sadam back in power he was good man kept Middle East under control and Bush war criminal for killing ur hero.
Click to expand...

I have no idea who said Sadam should be in power, or back in power. It wasn't the liberals.

Did they maybe say we shouldn't have been there? Yes. We shouldn't have gone in on our own? yes. Sadam was a good man and should be in power? No, that's something out of a political alternate reality you read about.
 
ElRoach0 said:
I have no idea who said Sadam should be in power, or back in power. It wasn't the liberals.

Did they maybe say we shouldn't have been there? Yes. We shouldn't have gone in on our own? yes. Sadam was a good man and should be in power? No, that's something out of a political alternate reality you read about.
Click to expand...

You libs would call Obama war criminal if he deposed Kim Jung Un. So sad this mental condition.

Sadam dips own ppl in acid and allows human rights violations of most egregious kinds. Yet to libs it is okay to allow but not okay when the South had slaves they were treating well and grooming for freedom.

So many contradictions in libs. Lincoln is hero but Bush is wars criminal. Maybe the boss Gameface can explain how u can fight for human rights in one type but not in Iraq. At least he makes the sense.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];1083192 said:
You libs would call Obama war criminal if he deposed Kim Jung Un. So sad this mental condition.

Sadam dips own ppl in acid and allows human rights violations of most egregious kinds. Yet to libs it is okay to allow but not okay when the South had slaves they were treating well and grooming for freedom.

So many contradictions in libs. Lincoln is hero but Bush is wars criminal. Maybe the boss Gameface can explain how u can fight for human rights in one type but not in Iraq. At least he makes the sense.
Click to expand...

There is no base to this post. What. So. Ever.

Lincoln did not blatantly lie, or at best misrepresent facts to rally support world wide for something that he, and his cabinet, directly benefit from monetarily.
 
ElRoach0 said:
There is no base to this post. What. So. Ever.

Lincoln did not blatantly lie, or at best misrepresent facts to rally support world wide for something that he, and his cabinet, directly benefit from monetarily.
Click to expand...

speaking of blatantly lying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DpBwmN66As
 
DutchJazzer said:
speaking of blatantly lying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DpBwmN66As
Click to expand...


Seeing exactly what you want to see, not something for what it is.

He said he'd end the war in Iraq. He didn't claim to say it was only his decision. Not once. But well, who cares about that when we can blame the black man.
 
That's the difference though..

he said we'd end the war in Iraq. We did.

You said you'd leave at 10k posts, you didn't.
You said you'd quit trolling. You didn't.
 
ElRoach0 said:
There is no base to this post. What. So. Ever.

Lincoln did not blatantly lie, or at best misrepresent facts to rally support world wide for something that he, and his cabinet, directly benefit from monetarily.
Click to expand...

No base? Lol

Stand up for Obama because democrat.

Crucify Bush because republican.

Defend Lincoln but not Bush for protect the humans rights.

It is all about team liberal. Throw common sense out window.
 
Weapons and violence have worked marvelously in the ME over the past 5,000 years. The only reason why the crusades or the dissolving of the Ottoman Empire didn't bring about peace was because there weren't enough weapons or violence.

Only after the USA kills every single uniformed ISIS member and all Muslims converted to Christianity (or be beheaded) will peace break out in the Middle East. Plus, it's easier than hell to tell who belongs to Isis, who belongs to Al Qaeda, etc since they all wear different uniforms.
 
The Thriller said:
Weapons and violence have worked marvelously in the ME over the past 5,000 years. The only reason why the crusades or the dissolving of the Ottoman Empire didn't bring about peace was because there weren't enough weapons or violence.

Only after the USA kills every single uniformed ISIS member and all Muslims converted to Christianity (or be beheaded) will peace break out in the Middle East. Plus, it's easier than hell to tell who belongs to Isis, who belongs to Al Qaeda, etc since they all wear different uniforms.
Click to expand...

Good plan.
 
My Mount Flushmore

Andrew Jackson-Trail of Tears
Andrew Johnson-Botched reconstruction
Richard Nixon-Criminal
George W. Bush-There goes the neighborhood

LBJ-Nearly makes my list for his handling of Vietnam but is propped up by landmark civil rights legislation.
 
♪alt13 said:
My Mount Flushmore

Andrew Jackson-Trail of Tears
Andrew Johnson-Botched reconstruction
Richard Nixon-Criminal
George W. Bush-There goes the neighborhood

LBJ-Nearly makes my list for his handling of Vietnam but is propped up by landmark civil rights legislation.
Click to expand...

obama not on list!

NEGGED!
 
♪alt13 said:
My Mount Flushmore

Andrew Jackson-Trail of Tears
Andrew Johnson-Botched reconstruction
Richard Nixon-Criminal
George W. Bush-There goes the neighborhood

LBJ-Nearly makes my list for his handling of Vietnam but is propped up by landmark civil rights legislation.
Click to expand...

No way is LBJ anywhere close to top 5 worst presidents, in my opinion. More like top 10 best IMO. Most presidents had a **** up or two.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top