C l u t c H 385
Banned
bat or glove? from you, probably the glove, queer.
Obama vs. Beantown
- Thread starter Beantown
- Start date
bat or glove? from you, probably the glove, queer.
C l u t c H 385
Banned
My guess is you'd go with the batting glove and disable the vibration reduction system.
Hopper
Banned
Raspberry Delight said:
Mebbe I can hep, eh, Bum?
Ya sayin Bum's a catcha, not no pitcha, dat it, eh, Clutch?
Isn't that where you met your husband?
D
Deleted member 95
Guest
No, that was at your mom's house!
/buuuuuuuuuuurn
...that totally made sense. High five.
Hopper
Banned
Made this post in another, more serious, thread, but for poor Beaner's sake Imma post it here too:
If I start advocating the legitimacy of coprophagia, I would expect a variety of responses. "Fools" like Beantown might try to argue that it is "unnatural," claim that it is evolutionarily suspect to think that ingesting foul waste serves a positive purpose, and object on that ground. They might even go so far as to say it should be prohibited. Others, consisting of more liberal types, might argue that such perverted practices are "harmless" and should not be illegal or punished. Even more licentious types might argue that it would be wrong to try to "discourage" such practices. But there are probably few who would argue that the practice should be fully legitimatized and promoted as "normal."
Why? Well, if for no other reason, just the reason that they personally find it disgusting, mebbe, eh? Of course, devoted practitioners would NOT find it disgusting, and would have no such objections. They would find it very attractive and desirable, and hence would have an entirely different "perspective," I spoze.
If I start advocating the legitimacy of coprophagia, I would expect a variety of responses. "Fools" like Beantown might try to argue that it is "unnatural," claim that it is evolutionarily suspect to think that ingesting foul waste serves a positive purpose, and object on that ground. They might even go so far as to say it should be prohibited. Others, consisting of more liberal types, might argue that such perverted practices are "harmless" and should not be illegal or punished. Even more licentious types might argue that it would be wrong to try to "discourage" such practices. But there are probably few who would argue that the practice should be fully legitimatized and promoted as "normal."
Why? Well, if for no other reason, just the reason that they personally find it disgusting, mebbe, eh? Of course, devoted practitioners would NOT find it disgusting, and would have no such objections. They would find it very attractive and desirable, and hence would have an entirely different "perspective," I spoze.
First you need to select all the posts you want to quote in your response by checking that little box as indicated. Then go back to the first post you've selected and hit "Reply With Quote" and you'll get a box with all the quotes showing separately. Then you have to do some editing (copy and paste) to move the end quote tags - shown as [/quote] - from the intermediate quotes to the end of the last quote. It's probably best if you do this using the "Go Advanced" mode so you can preview before you submit the post.
Trying to do a "demo" - let's see, first I "selected" posts #223, 224 and 225 then hit "Reply With Quote" in post #223 and got this:
NOTE: IN THE FIRST EXAMPLE, I'VE REMOVED THE END ] FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES
NOTE: IN THE FIRST EXAMPLE, I'VE REMOVED THE END ] FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES