What's new
By:

Official Game Thread: "Uh oh, it's Magic" at Jazz...Saturday, 4/21, 8:30pm MT

Brown Notes said:
Harris is very clearly better over the last couple months than he just about ever has. Al is playing better than he ever has. Millsap is amazing everyone.

On top of that our very precious young players are actually showing up at a rate that IMO is very likely way above the average. I doubt anyone here is skeptical about Favors. Burks has had 2 strong games in a row. Kanter has had two very strong showings in a row. Hayward is like a miracle. If none of that has anything to do with coaching then I don't know what coaching is.

People on this site cannot wait to fire somebody. As a Browns fan I can tell you the satisfaction is very short lived when you find out the new guy isn't any better.
Click to expand...


Do you find Hayward dreamy as well?
 
A big reason for his insane PER is his 2:1 assist to turnover ration. No other big men getting 30+ minutes can sniff that.
 
Verlin said:
This speaks nothing of derons abilities. Don't be a knucklehead.
Click to expand...

Woah that's not what I was insinuating. Didn't mean to come off that way. It's just insane how amazing utahs situation is after the trade and just how screwed the nets really are. Koc...wow
 
Verlin said:
Hating on favors while droolin on your boy aj. This is typical.
Click to expand...

Man, some of you really need some reading comprehension.

All I said was that Favors currently does not require an instant double team on the low post. Am I wrong? And for the record, I would take Favors way before I took Jefferson. Favors has the size and athleticsim to eventually become a force on BOTH ends of the court. While I love Big Al from an offensive point of view, I realize that his lack of athleticsim will always leave him as a liability on the defensive side of the ball.
 
jazzman12 said:
Man, some of you really need some reading comprehension.

All I said was that Favors currently does not require an instant double team on the low post. Am I wrong? And for the record, I would take Favors way before I took Jefferson. Favors has the size and athleticsim to eventually become a force on BOTH ends of the court. While I love Big Al from an offensive point of view, I realize that his lack of athleticsim will always leave him as a liability on the defensive side of the ball.
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah. I agree with you.
 
522192_155309857931852_100003585162706_192786_453348704_n.jpg
 
jazzman12 said:
Man, some of you really need some reading comprehension.

All I said was that Favors currently does not require an instant double team on the low post. Am I wrong? And for the record, I would take Favors way before I took Jefferson. Favors has the size and athleticsim to eventually become a force on BOTH ends of the court. While I love Big Al from an offensive point of view, I realize that his lack of athleticsim will always leave him as a liability on the defensive side of the ball.
Click to expand...

Actually, yes, you are wrong about a lot of things. You've given no statistical or other proof of the many things you've claimed over the past few pages. The truth is that Al isn't an efficient offensive player for the number of touches and plays he is given, and he is "trending down" on defense.

If others need "reading comprehension," perhaps you need to learn how to watch the game.
 
Last edited:
That is a game that defines why I love NBA basketball. It was very well played by both teams and the refs called nearly a perfect game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top