They are not the "end all be all", but thanks for polarizing it with your stupendous oratory.
The main point is this, to say that Curry is the best shooter in NBA history at this point is horse ****. The dudes a pup and hasn't done **** yet. Curry is obviously a more complete player than Korver. Korver doesn't have the opportunities to do what Curry does, because he's incapable of even putting himself in those positions. With respect to attempts, how in the hell could Korver ever change that? It's like looking at a player from another era and saying "he just didn't put up enough shots", when the average was so much lower then. Name the players in NBA history who have ever shot over 50% for the year from three. Here I'll help you:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/leaders/fg3_pct_season.html. By the way, Curry's coach is probably a better shooter than Curry. If you're not basing his skill mostly on percentage than you're basing it on speculation about shot difficulty. By the same token why don't we throw Durant into the mix, since his percentages would be much higher if he didn't shoot difficult shots, right?