They did?The Jazz turned down a #3 pick for Favors in the last draft. Doubt they'd move him for Bledsoe.
</weaksauce>
They did?The Jazz turned down a #3 pick for Favors in the last draft. Doubt they'd move him for Bledsoe.
</weaksauce>
So who's The Domino of this trade deadline, realistically? What player is everyone waiting to see what happens on, or is this all pretty even-keeled between Garnett/Josh Smith/Al and it just comes down to who goes first?
Bill Simmons on the Ryen Russillo show was asked about the Utah situation.
Says a deal that makes sense to him is a three team deal.
Boston gets Favors
Clips get Garnett
Utah gets Bledsoe.
Holy hell, is he retarded or what?
Don't remember that. But I can see the reason why, if true. It was really the Big 2 (Davis and MKG) and everyone else. It would have been tough to give up a guy you're projecting to be a future star for a small-college PG that hadn't yet shown he could play in the NBA.The Jazz turned down a #3 pick for Favors in the last draft. Doubt they'd move him for Bledsoe.
</weaksauce>
Great question.
I'm wondering how our roster flexibility is factoring into these talks. We have a full roster, so how do we trade BOTH Al and Paul when most deals probably have us taking back more players? Etc.
Great question.
I'm wondering how our roster flexibility is factoring into these talks. We have a full roster, so how do we trade BOTH Al and Paul when most deals probably have us taking back more players? Etc.
So who's The Domino of this trade deadline, realistically? What player is everyone waiting to see what happens on, or is this all pretty even-keeled between Garnett/Josh Smith/Al and it just comes down to who goes first?
Not sure if you need to have roster spots available in order to make the trade. I think before you can waive an incoming player, he has to be part of your roster. Maybe one of the board experts can weigh in on this one.Id' say by a combination of waiving incoming players and considering the buyout of Bell and the removal of players like Watson, Murphy and Evans.
I think the Jazz would be stupid to let that get in the way. If the right deal is there, then cut Raja and/or Murphy. That shouldnt hold up a deal.
Id' say by a combination of waiving incoming players and considering the buyout of Bell and the removal of players like Watson, Murphy and Evans.
Not sure if you need to have roster spots available in order to make the trade...before you waive an incoming player. Maybe one of the board experts can weigh in on this one.
But yes, I agree on releasing current Jazz players: if Bledsoe is part of a deal, you don't really need Watson. Tinsley is the backup and Foye and Burks can be the 3rd PG's until Mo returns. Bell and Murphy are very expendable. Evans is also expendable, but as a last resort. It's nice to have a contract of his size for future trade possibilities. And he's a great teammate.