InGameStrategy
Well-Known Member
Both I and recent history respectfully disagree. The Laker frontcourt would've pwned Okur. As usual.If we had memo in the lakers series, i guarantee we wouldn't have been swept. Like him or not, Memo is still a better option at center than Fesenko.
April 2: Gasol starts at center, ends one assist short of a triple-double. Okur 11 points, 3 RBs, and a -19 on-court point differential.
https://www.nba.com/games/20100402/UTALAL/gameinfo.html#nbaGIboxscore
February 10: Gasol 22 and 19 at center; Okur 3 for 10, 6 points, 4 rebounds. At least he had only a -4 on-court point differential.
https://www.nba.com/games/20100210/LALUTA/gameinfo.html#nbaGIboxscore
December 12: Bynum starts, doesn't do much; Jazz win. But Okur couldn't even manage a positive +/-. 4 for 12 for 10 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 fouls.
Maybe MO could've helped eke out one win. But he would've likely contributed to the loss of lead (or chance of lead) that was repeated in each of the four games by Boozer, Millsap, Deron, and 2 wings. I'd say, at best, that Okur is slightly better alongside Boozer than Millsap is. Maybe vice versa, too. Okur brings crucial height relative to CB or PM, but it comes at the expense of footwork. Not that Booze or Fes or even Millsap is a gazelle, but the Matador Factor is reduced when at least one of the latter two players is on the court.
Last edited: