Pacers Heat
- Thread starter northeast
- Start date
Fixed for you. I'm a nice guy like that.
There were a lot of facts on that post.
There was some conjecture.
There is good conjecture , and bad conjecture.
Good conjecture uses facts and sound logic.
As a society, we have a serious problem of too much influence of a legal system that overly relies on proof and not conjecture, and therefore makes bad decisions, locks us into unjust or inefficient realities, and stifles the improvement that requires good conjecture.
I wonder if you are part of the problem, and yet you fancy yourself as a benevolent influence.
There was some conjecture.
There is good conjecture , and bad conjecture.
Good conjecture uses facts and sound logic.
As a society, we have a serious problem of too much influence of a legal system that overly relies on proof and not conjecture, and therefore makes bad decisions, locks us into unjust or inefficient realities, and stifles the improvement that requires good conjecture.
I wonder if you are part of the problem, and yet you fancy yourself as a benevolent influence.
Last edited:
It is still conjecture.
So I am right. You are arguing something I never got into. In the words of Mr. Miyagi "Focus".
I'm not arguing at all. All I am saying is your "facts" are mostly conjecture. Good or bad but conjecture.
Now dance
Well if Haslem gets a 1 or 2 game suspension, that game could ultimately work out in the favor of the Pacers.
I'm not sure how you punish Pittman. He isn't playing any way. I think you have to fine the balls out of him and suspend him for the rest of the series. Not sure if he will ever bee needed, but I guess he might if Haslem can't play.
I'm not sure how you punish Pittman. He isn't playing any way. I think you have to fine the balls out of him and suspend him for the rest of the series. Not sure if he will ever bee needed, but I guess he might if Haslem can't play.
No , you are stating a false statement.