If you're told by somebody that they saw an assistant coach that you directly employ showering with a 10-year old boy and you tell your AD only to then distance yourself from the entire situation, you are a bad guy. Period, black and white, end of discussion.
I'm going to take this approach.
We know Sandusky is a creep, and a bad guy, and whatever else anyone want to call him.
We know Paterno, and others should have made better decisions and made sure the police were involved from the first moment it was discovered. Does that make Paterno a "bad guy"? I still don't have enough information one way or the other. He could be a bad guy, but he could be a decent guy that made a very bad decision in a moment of truth. I say this to try to be fair, but deep down I think he's known something was wrong, and he knows he made the wrong choice to let it go and let Sandusky off the hook. Any one of these people should have pushed it. The campus police, the GA, AD, University officers, parents should have known something weird was going on, the guy at the school that let kids visit with Sandusky during school hours unsupervised, Sandusky's wife, and probably many other people should have initiated something. This whole scenario is messed up big time.
I don't even have words to explain how sickened I am by Sandusky, and I guess the enablers, for what happened. How many lives were messed up, starting with the kids?
I guess when I read my own post, I must agree with Jazzman12 on this more than any sliver of hope I have for Paterno's goodness. I can't really find any reasonable way to convince myself it would ever be right not to go to the police if I saw a grown man in a shower with a 10 year old boy under the circumstances described, or if I heard a report that someone that works for me was doing this even once.
Last edited: