What's new

Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Organs

All sting operations are "dishonest" in that the people doing the sting are generally undercover. Nobody shows up, hey, I'm a reporter, I need you to be completely candid with me!

And no, as I mentioned, why are there different "transport costs" for different organs? Sounds a lot like pricing no? Woman NEVER mentions the term "transport costs." Also doesn't cover changing the procedure to harvest more organs, which is illegal. You WANT to be deceived on this, which is OK I guess.

I have no problem with such sting operations. They can, however, easily be taken out of context depending on how they are presented.

Apparently, however, the right is conflicted on this issue. The right (or elements on it) are agitating (or have even proposed or passed) laws prohibiting activists from doing sting organizations in meat production facilities. So apparently it's not the sting part their opposed to, it's who gets stung.
 
Upstanding organization with a great history?

I'm assuming you don't know a lot about its founder.

I'm assuming you know a lot about the characters of some of our Founding Fathers? Jefferson, for example, owned, sold and had whipped human beings. Doesn't make what he helped create any less worthwhile.

Or, to put things closer to home,

I can think of a founder of a prominent local organization that was a serial adulterer, who sent men on missions and took their wives as his own, and who manipulated women under his power into bed. I guess that means that the organization he created can't be any good either. Right?
 
What about if a prenatal screen found serious defects in the unborn child, such as a defect that would make it's life miserable and short but would impose significant medical care costs on the parents? What about if the parent was a poor, single mother?

we could be missing out on the next stephen hawking! he would have been aborted?
 
I'm assuming you know a lot about the characters of some of our Founding Fathers? Jefferson, for example, owned, sold and had whipped human beings. Doesn't make what he helped create any less worthwhile.

Or, to put things closer to home,

I can think of a founder of a prominent local organization that was a serial adulterer, who sent men on missions and took their wives as his own, and who manipulated women under his power into bed. I guess that means that the organization he created can't be any good either. Right?

You must not have read my posts on Joseph Smith ;)
 
I'm guessing that the large % of PP in minority neighborhoods reflects the general lack of access of minority women to reproductive health care. I'm a bit skeptical about the statistic of more black babies aborted than born. It could be true, but it rings more like propaganda than fact to me.

I'm guessing that there's a reasonably strong correlation between income/wealth and abortions. I can think of a number of hypotheses why this would be the case.

I believe, however, that the trends line for # of abortions is falling.

I'm just curious, IF you were made King of the world with absolute power, would you force women with unwanted pregnancies to carry to term and deliver?

What about if the woman was a very poor single mom with 4 children already? What about if a prenatal screen found serious defects in the unborn child, such as a defect that would make it's life miserable and short but would impose significant medical care costs on the parents? What about if the parent was a poor, single mother?

I understand you oppose abortion, but I'm just trying to understand how dogmatic you are about it, or if you allow that there are circumstances where you (as absolute powerful King) would allow it, or if your proscription against it would be universal.

I would pose the same question to others who are staunch anti-choice advocates.

(You may have already answered this in another post, if so, forgive me.)

Fwiw, the stats came from New York, an unbiased report. I'll try to find and link it.

To answer shortly and bluntly because I'm lazy, I view abortion as murder. I cannot support it, unless it is necessary for the mother to live (ie, giving birth will kill her).
 
I don't know how to link videos off of my ipad so you'll just have to go to this site, but watch this video. Watch the whole thing or start it at about 7 minutes. Look at the "fetus" that they're dissecting. Just look at it. The arms, the legs, the head, the organs. Look at them. This is horrific.

https://www.lifenews.com/2015/07/28...esident-selling-body-parts-of-aborted-babies/


nah rather not.

but if you got a video where they dissect the planned parenthood officails who are in those undercover vids. i'd be happy to watch that. preferably i want them to be dissected alive
 
A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers. The group is the same one that previously released three covertly shot videos of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research.

The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization.


**** the courtsystem
 
Oh, goodie, another abortion debate. I say make as many babies as possible, so the next generation will have more soldiers to kill more people in our next war. Killing is cool, just so long as it's people in another country that may or may not be in cahoots with bad guys.
 
Holy crap this is awful. Warning the last half is tough to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=677&v=GWQuZMvcFA8
 
Back
Top