true true. but hes proven in my mind that his size isnt going to severely limit him in the NBA. we dont know that about smart yet.
play along: What could Trey + #23 get us?
- Thread starter [size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
- Start date
true true. but hes proven in my mind that his size isnt going to severely limit him in the NBA. we dont know that about smart yet.
Also, I will go on record to say I was HUGE on us drafting Burke last year. He's not a scrub but if we can move him for Smart I would prefer Smart. If Smart was a mediocre defender he would probably be drafted toward the end of the lottery (perhaps not even in the lottery).
But he's a VERY GOOD defender and his passing skills around pretty similar to Burke's, numbers-wise. Though I think Burke had a higher number of offensively-gifted teammates during his time at Michigan.
Yes - Smart needs to work on his shooting but he's got the tools needed to be a great NBA player.
But he's a VERY GOOD defender and his passing skills around pretty similar to Burke's, numbers-wise. Though I think Burke had a higher number of offensively-gifted teammates during his time at Michigan.
Yes - Smart needs to work on his shooting but he's got the tools needed to be a great NBA player.
he wont be anywhere near as good in the nba as wade. he'll be much close to nate robinson.
Smart is half a foot taller than Robinson and plays a very different game. Robinson is actually a pretty good shooter from behind the ark and is very tough (similar to Wade and Smart). But Robinson is know to be a liability on defense.
Like Wade, Smart is a very good defender. Robinson is not known for his rebounding. Smart is a very good rebounder, like Wade. Also, if you watch college games with Smart, you will quickly see he's an opportunist - part of the reason why he gets tons of steals and drives to the basket for an easy shot (I've also seen him cut to the basket for a fair amount of lay-ups/ally-oops) and finally, like Wade, most of Smart's threes are when he's open.
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
For hell sake, Smart >>>> Burke. It isn't close.
I, too, lobbied for Burke. But I've seen what I've seen. Exum or Smart would be an upgrade + we can move Burke for a good asset. What's not to like?
I, too, lobbied for Burke. But I've seen what I've seen. Exum or Smart would be an upgrade + we can move Burke for a good asset. What's not to like?
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Huh?
Burke shot <40%, can't get to the rim and can't get around anyone. I'd say his size - and lack of quickness - definitely limits him in the NBA.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];839174 said:
If that is the route the FO takes then I will hate to see Burke go as I like him but in the pursuit of a championship no player is untouchable.
I'd rather see them try and get a deal with the Cavs for the #1 pick though.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Smart:Robinson as Burke
alacioJK, Rev9. Burke can become a serviceable PG. Jazz will need to upgrade at some point in order to contend, but he's fine for now. If the Jazz stay at #5, I'd much rather have them take Vonleh or Gordon who could both develop into all-stars.
You're not playing along very well.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
c'mon dude..... everybody would prefer this over staying at #5. But since it isn't going to happen.............................
Park Bites
Well-Known Member
I like burke but smart and exum are better.
Where did you hear that? I live near Boston and haven't heard any specific guys they've talked about. Not saying they wouldn't because Ainge is a pretty good GM. I have heard more about the Celtics wanting to get a true center so Sullinger can play his true position more.