I was not aware that simply being at a location where police were shot was a crime. The term accomplice suggests she aided her husband and/or Acoli in some fashion. Harper (the trooper who survived) says he didn't see her with a gun. In what way did she aid her husband or Acoli in the shooting, in your opinion? Is her simply being there enough?
During the last trial, a state assemblyman addressed the jury directly, urging them to convict. That alone should be enough to declare a mistrial.
The more I read about this case, the more it stinks.
It might be the backfire effect.
As for being on the terror suspect, she's been in hiding for the last several months because there is a rather large bounty for her.
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terrorists
The only reason listed for Shakur's (listed as Chesimard, because even the dignity of choosing her own name is denied her) presence is the turnpike shoot-out and subsequent escape.
Meanwhile, according to wikipedia, every other attempt to convict her failed for lack of evidence and/or a violation of due process.
E. J. Wells, what did you mean by "what has been going on in the last six months"?