Not quite a white flag, but I'll accept it.
A police officer never has to shoot an unarmed man who is standing with his hands over his head.
*dead fairy*
That would be very sad, indeed.
It would be. I'm not saying that I want nothing to change, btw, just in case I'm not clear. Will you agree that the firing of the chief was largely because they had to do "something"?
Which of these justifies shooting a person, and if none of them do, why is this relevant?
If you read the back and forth between dickless and me, you'll see that I'm not claiming any justification for any shooting, and that in the context of our discussion, what I wrote is relevant.
Agreed. Surrender matters, also.
Just as long as that is really what happened, which of course in this case, didn't.
