What's new

Popeyes Chicken Sandwich

Ill take your avoidance of answering my question as evidence that you haven’t stopped to consider just how rapidly what and how Americans have been eating has changed. Like, stupendously over just the past 50 years. Don’t act like we are self-generating our own diets and preferences.

America has a huge diet problem. It’s unhealthy and unsustainable....

You can take it however you want. Until mass factory farms are no longer the most economically viable way to supply the meat demand they are here to stay. Hell, Americans set a record for meat consumption per average last year. And factory farm grown animals has boomed as a result.

All this rapid change not withstanding.

Also, yes, sometimes I do need that damn chicken sandwich. But I prefer a nice thick chicken strip with mashed potatoes and gravy for a dip.
 
You can take it however you want. Until mass factory farms are no longer the most economically viable way to supply the meat demand they are here to stay. Hell, Americans set a record for meat consumption per average last year. And factory farm grown animals has boomed as a result.

All this rapid change not withstanding.

Also, yes, sometimes I do need that damn chicken sandwich. But I prefer a nice thick chicken strip with mashed potatoes and gravy for a dip.
That’s not a need. This is the classic confusion of want and need.

And, per usual, you’ve dropped a critical dimension of what I’m arguing. This time, it’s sustainability (and, by extension, the large-scale imposition of animal misery). If you think Americans should just blithely continue indulging their wants as if they are needs at the expense of sustainability and the feeling of sentient creatures, then what does that make you?

Take a look at america’s healthcare problem. The vast majority of costs are going to metabolic problems that are resulting from people eating like ****. Period.
 
I like my soylent green cold and wet. Because I hate nice things and eating it that way shows people just how determined I am to be a miserable jackass.
 
That’s not a need. This is the classic confusion of want and need.

And, per usual, you’ve dropped a critical dimension of what I’m arguing. This time, it’s sustainability (and, by extension, the large-scale imposition of animal misery). If you think Americans should just blithely continue indulging their wants as if they are needs at the expense of sustainability and the feeling of sentient creatures, then what does that make you?

Take a look at america’s healthcare problem. The vast majority of costs are going to metabolic problems that are resulting from people eating like ****. Period.

I didn’t miss it, I ignored it as I took your initial response as intellectually dishonest. And as such not worthy of real discussion. Perhaps I was wrong. It’s happened before lol

Also, there is a MASSIVE (x Infinity) difference between what I think Americans should do and what I think they will do.

If you cannot see that what does that make you?

So again, has it successfully been done? I’m genuinely curious and figured that your passion for this issue would mean you’re more informed than me.
 
I didn’t miss it, I ignored it as I took your initial response as intellectually dishonest. And as such not worthy of real discussion. Perhaps I was wrong. It’s happened before lol

Also, there is a MASSIVE (x Infinity) difference between what I think Americans should do and what I think they will do.

If you cannot see that what does that make you?

So again, has it successfully been done? I’m genuinely curious and figured that your passion for this issue would mean you’re more informed than me.
More humane versions of farming than the current industrial model were successful in raising successive generations of humans for thousands of years.

Here we are, Stoked, in a place you seem to end up in so often. Where you just don’t feel like your point is getting across. So tell me, what’s your point here? And while you’re at it, why don’t you also explain what you thought I was being intellectually dishonest about.
 
Given the choice the chicken would probably prefer i had a salad...
Go to Texas.... try to find a salad on any menu that doesn’t have meat on it. Chicken being the most popular option. Texas is the worst for this, but the rest of the country isn’t that different.
 
More humane versions of farming than the current industrial model were successful in raising successive generations of humans for thousands of years.

Here we are, Stoked, in a place you seem to end up in so often. Where you just don’t feel like your point is getting across. So tell me, what’s your point here? And while you’re at it, why don’t you also explain what you thought I was being intellectually dishonest about.


I felt you intentionally avoided a direct question. Something that happens routinely in my line of work unfortunately. So often that I am actively trained, professionally, in identifying it. I’m paid to deal with it then. Here... not so much.

And we haven’t ended up anywhere together. You are at said place on your own.

I’ll break my place down for you.

You. Passion. Possibly. Knowledge?
I. Want. You. Share? I. Want. Know. More. You. No. Be. ***.
 
I felt you intentionally avoided a direct question. Something that happens routinely in my line of work unfortunately. So often that I am actively trained, professionally, in identifying it. I’m paid to deal with it then. Here... not so much.

And we haven’t ended up anywhere together. You are at said place on your own.

I’ll break my place down for you.

You. Passion. Possibly. Knowledge?
I. Want. You. Share? I. Want. Know. More. You. No. Be. ***.
I’m paid to NOT submit to poorly framed and narrow questions. Like the one you asked, for example.

A discussion doesn’t begin when one person determines the question. Therefore, when you asked an inappropriately narrow one (inappropriate, relative to the complexity of the situation), I simply added my own question alongside yours. This is normal behavior. You got triggered, doe.
 
I’m paid to NOT submit to poorly framed and narrow questions. Like the one you asked, for example.

A discussion doesn’t begin when one person determines the question. Therefore, when you asked an inappropriately narrow one (inappropriate, relative to the complexity of the situation), I simply added my own question alongside yours. This is normal behavior. You got triggered, doe.

You confused triggered with dismissed. But that’s normal with you. Self deluded intellectual superiority and all.
Im glad you refused to not be an ***. Very on brand for you and why I like you. Glad you don’t do what your good at for free. Earn that money. I’ll find my info from a source willing to do so.
 
You confused triggered with dismissed. But that’s normal with you. Self deluded intellectual superiority and all.
Im glad you refused to not be an ***. Very on brand for you and why I like you. Glad you don’t do what your good at for free. Earn that money. I’ll find my info from a source willing to do so.
You’re Captain Triggered, so pardon my error.

Get better at what you do, btw. My basic rhetorical strategy shouldn’t have sent you to the conclusion it did.
 
Back
Top