Post your 2013 Remockdraft

[orangello]

This saddens me, because I agree.. but I just don't think we ever become really relevant without stretching the floor with our bigs. They will never.

You might be wrong.

 

[Dr. Jones]

You might be wrong.

So you dig up a year old post, put in a "might" qualifier, and yet don't explain a single thing about what "might" be wrong?
Did you post this to;

A) say our bigs "might" stretch the floor
B) we "might" become "really relevant"
C) or just try to show your *** with some ******** don't say anything at all crap

Well?

 

[orangello]

So you dig up a year old post, put in a "might" qualifier, and yet don't explain a single thing about what "might" be wrong?
Did you post this to;

A) say our bigs "might" stretch the floor
B) we "might" become "really relevant"
C) or just try to show your *** with some ******** don't say anything at all crap

Well?

Partial posts are my th

 

[orangello]

So you dig up a year old post, put in a "might" qualifier, and yet don't explain a single thing about what "might" be wrong?
Did you post this to;

A) say our bigs "might" stretch the floor
B) we "might" become "really relevant"
C) or just try to show your *** with some ******** don't say anything at all crap

Well?

In all reality, during that time of the season I was starting to think that the Jazz should use Favors as trade bait. I couldn't see a Favors/Rudy line up working for a good stretch of the game.

If you look back at this thread I agreed with most about the need of a stretch 4.

I wiffed hard. Just having some fun is all.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Partial posts are my theriouth bithneth.

Allow me to finish this one.

 

[orangello]

Allow me to finish this one.

Nice work.

 

[Dr. Jones]

In all reality, during that time of the season I was starting to think that the Jazz should use Favors ad trade bait because I could see a Favors/Rudy line up working for a good stretch of the game.

If you look back at this thread I agreed with most about the need of a stretch 4.

I wiffed hard. Just having some fun is all.

I re-read your first sentence and twice and am now convinced why shorter posts are your thing.

 

[orangello]

I re-read your first sentence and twice and am now convinced why shorter posts are your thing.

Yea, proof reading isn't my thing either. English is hard.

I've fixed that other post. Hopefully it makes more sense to you now.

 

[green]

All I know is when I hey announced we traded for Trey I yelled no no no no no as my idiot bro started trash talking me because he actually thought trey would be good. Looking back giving up those two picks for Trey now seems like we gave too much.

My question is if we hadn't made that trade who would we have taken at 14? I'm guessing we would've taken Gobert at 21.

Locke said the plan was to take Gobert at 14. When Trey slid, Utah traded up. When Gobert slid, Utah traded up to get him.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Locke said the plan was to take Gobert at 14. When Trey slid, Utah traded up. When Gobert slid, Utah traded up to get him.

Would have sucked dick if we traded up for Burke and Gobert didn't end up sliding.

 

[Carbon13]

It would have been sweet if we'd just taken Giannis and Gobert.

 

[My2Cents]

Would have sucked dick if we traded up for Burke and Gobert didn't end up sliding.

Yup. That could have been a disastrous draft. Trade up for Burke and leave Rudy and Antetokounmpo on the board.