Power Rankings

[Saint Cy of JFC]

The discussion was about small guards. IMO, all 175 lbs of Parker qualifies him for inclusion in that list.

He weights 175 lbs because of the great NAOS eye test.

 

[LogGrad98]

Yeah, so many 5'9 PGs winning rings.

Pretty small sample size actually. How many PG under 6 feet have there been in the NBA? Still doesn't mean it can't happen. Unless you are just prophesying or trolling again. Either way it's still a ridiculous assertion.

 

[Cappy_Smurf]

Either way there is still precedent for a small guard leading a championship team. I'm not arguing that the current Isaiah Thomas can or will do that but the comment that a "midget" can't lead a championship team is stupid.

What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.

 

[LogGrad98]

What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.

Not sure why your quoting me. I never made any comments about that. I was only attacking the absurd assertion that a shorter guard cannot lead a championship team.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Pretty small sample size actually. How many PG under 6 feet have there been in the NBA? Still doesn't mean it can't happen. Unless you are just prophesying or trolling again. Either way it's still a ridiculous assertion.

So whenever anyone disagrees with you it's trolling?

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Not sure why your quoting me. I never made any comments about that. I was only attacking the absurd assertion that a shorter guard cannot lead a championship team.

It's an absurd notion yet it has happened only twice in NBA history with Isiah Thomas in 89 and 90?

 

[8]

What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.

Boston was more efficient on defense than Utah last season.

 

[FalseFlagg K]

Boston was more efficient on defense than Utah last season.

team defense, not attributable to the midget. And playing in that festering junkpile that is the eastern conference.

 

[silesian]

Totally right. If Parker was 5'9 he would be the same player. Never uses his height or length to drive to the basket or anything.

If Parker was 4'10" he would be the same player. Never uses his height or length to drive to the basket or anything.

 

[Ron Mexico]

If Parker was 4'10" he would be the same player. Never uses his height or length to drive to the basket or anything.

Parker uses everything he has. Most of his layups are with a defenders hand within an inch of blocking him. If he was any shorter or less reach he would be worse.

 

[Cappy_Smurf]

Boston was more efficient on defense than Utah last season.

Isiah Thomas does have some teamates who are good defensively. Not sure what that has to do with individual defensive ability though.

Anyway, I'm still waiting for any of the IT fans here to admit they'd trade any of our players for him. I've already stated there are at least 3 Jazz players I wouldn't trade straight up, and several others I probably wouldn't trade for him. The all star label is completely misleading in some cases, and this is a prime example IMO.

 

[NAOS]

He weights 175 lbs because of the great NAOS eye test.

your famous google method produces results of 177 lbs. Most players play below their listed weights for a good portion of the season. You're taking a fat L on this one, douchenugget.