Based on what we know now?
1. Embiid
2. Wiggins
3. Randle
4. Favors
5. Smart
6. Burks
7. Hayward
8. Kanter
9. Saric
10. Gordon
11. Vonleh
12. Parker
13. Burke
14. McDermott
Based on what we know now?
1. Embiid
2. Wiggins
3. Randle
4. Favors
5. Smart
6. Burks
7. Hayward
8. Kanter
9. Saric
10. Gordon
11. Vonleh
12. Parker
13. Burke
14. McDermott
The way I think I would see it::
1. Embiid
2. Wiggins
3. Parker
4. Exum
5. Favors
6. Kanter
7. Gordon
8. Smart
9. Vonleh
10. Saric
11. Hayward
12. Burks
13. Randle
14. McDermott
Burke: 25-30 (then again, I see players like Miciic who are slotted around 36 being better than him).
Gobert: 28-38 (because it is still unknown wether he will add enough lower body strength and be able to catch the ball in the post, pass, shoot, etc.)
Did Exum die?
Why'd you put Smush Parker @12? I know you don't like Jabari......but.....
No. In his only real experience, he was mediocre against HS kids. Why would I put him in the top 14 including five NBA players? That's crazy.
really? i saw him play a highschool game in its entirety and he DOMINATED
his line was 20 points, 15 assists, 6 rebounds 4 steals and 1 Block in the final game of a tournament
in that tournament he averaged 28.2ppg, 7.3 rebs, 6.6 asts... thats not mediocre
Apparently Smush has improved a ton since he last played in the league.
it was reported that Smush Parker punched a 16 year old kid in the face during a pickup game in NYC a few months ago
Not sure what tournament (2 games?) you're referring to, but...
Over the course of the U19 - sample size matters - he averaged 18, 4 and 4 on 44% FGs. That is indeed mediocre.
the Australian Schools Championship - Lake Ginninderra vs. The Scotts College was the gold medal game with the 15 assists
im not sure how many rounds the tournament is, but in 2008 there were 145 teams from 7 different states/territories at the championship; split up into 4 divisions, Mens and Womens, junior and senior... so im going to assume it was a good few games at least