What's the #1 state sponsor of terrorism again? Link?
I'm not sure it really matters tbh. It would be trivial for Iran to turn the payment into cash regardless of how we pay them.Strange that they left out the part where we agreed to send a plane load of unmarked bills. That seems like a really big deal, especially because many terrorism experts say that cash is necessary for funding terrorism.
The Iran deal seems like a bad joke. The idea that some world court might have obligated America to pay $10 billion to the number one state sponsor of terrorism in the world would seems like a joke as well.
I agree.Obama has been hilariously non-transparent,
I don't understand what you're trying to say.I'm hoping there are few ppl left in this planet willing to argue otherwise
https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politics/state-department-report-terrorism/What's the #1 state sponsor of terrorism again? Link?
In general I tend to agree. The US does have a long history of send cash to the middle east. But hey! At least we didn't 'lose' it this time!I would think a wire would be ideal and most safe in today's age.. but whatevs.