Richard Carrier present an interesting result from a maximally knowledgeable God

[franklin]

Mormon theology addresses this point directly.

Mormon theology FTW. Evolution, One Bruh, evolution.

 

[franklin]

Actually, the argument is that God *must* know what it is like to enjoy anything, and that therefore he can not know what it is like to not know something.

Except magic put Jesus through that not knowing something for everything that humanity experienced or ever would (take that, free agency).

 

[One Brow]

What is the difference of this from the ancient questions of people about the omniscience, perfection or the infinite powers of the God?

All of those questions referred to logical impossibilities, things that are impossible by definition. This argument refers to different things a person can know, knowledge of either (and both) being possessed by humans and beings that are capable of change, but that can not be both known simultaneously by an eternal, unchanging being.

 

[One Brow]

Mormon theology FTW. Evolution, One Bruh, evolution.

The "win" being that arguments against the Trinitarian god don't work against the Mormon god, and vice-versa?

 

[One Brow]

Except magic put Jesus through that not knowing something for everything that humanity experienced or ever would (take that, free agency).

So the Father of the trinity is not omniscient in Himself? Not acceptable to a Trinitarian.