1/5 of the Qur'an is direct scientific claims some of them not known at the time it was written, none of it proven to be false to this day. The Qur'an takes stories from the bible and corrects them. Also the Qur'an is shorter then the Bible, how is running out of space any sort of argument?
For example: In the Qur'an the ruler in the time of Moses was called Pharaoh, however in the time of Yusuf he was called King. People wondered this for centures why it did a distinction. However, in 1799 the roseta stone was discovered and it allowed the egyptian hieroglyphics to be read. It stated that in the time of Moses he was called Pharaoh. The title Pharaoh wasn't used for the ruler of Egypt until the years after Prophet Yusuf's dead and the ruler at that time he was called King.
At the of Muhammad the egyptian heiroglyphics was a dead language as well just as it was until 1799.
The Bible and the Torah used the title of Pharaoh and King without distinction, and was written 700+ years before the Qur'an.
The difference between me and SiroMar is that I provide rational evidence to support my claims and SiroMar makes stuff up.
From now on, I'll just use my signature for verses from the Quran. Good comedy must always be shared.